Last visit was: 12 Jul 2025, 15:48 It is currently 12 Jul 2025, 15:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kingb
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Last visit: 28 Nov 2017
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
764
 [76]
Given Kudos: 2
Products:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 764
 [76]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
62
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mbaiseasy
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Last visit: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
1,989
 [5]
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Posts: 323
Kudos: 1,989
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
vishu1414
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Last visit: 20 Jul 2015
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
707
 [3]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 44
Kudos: 707
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
getgyan
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 380
Own Kudos:
987
 [3]
Given Kudos: 269
Affiliations: SAE
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Project Management (Energy)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 380
Kudos: 987
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1B

2 drivers
1 drives 100 km per month other drives 1000km per month

Insurance cost for both = ((1000+100)/2) = 550 per month (Suppose Insurance cost is same as the average number of km driven) = 600 (50 profit)

If only 1 drivers then insurance cost – 100 per month i.e. 150 after profit
If only 2 drivers then insurance cost – 1000 per month i.e. 1050 after profit

We see that the insurance cost gets subsidized for those who drive more by 450. Is not it?

What did I assume in my solution? “Suppose Insurance cost is same as the average number of km driven” i.e. the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average

:-D
User avatar
Pansi
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87
Status:Fighting hard
GMAT Date: 10-01-2012
Posts: 42
Kudos: 312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
  
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia
  
(A) the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance – IMO POE does not immediately eliminate this. But logically, here, we are discussing about the ones who drive more miles and the ones who drive less. So this statement is not relevant.
(B) the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average. On hold.
(C) the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver – Goes out in the the first instance of POE application.
(D) Insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year- On hold.
(E) Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers. Goes out in the the first instance of POE application.

I was stuck between B&D. Chose D instead of B, the OA. In hindsight B looks to support the Argument more directly compared to D, which is generic.
User avatar
veergmat
Joined: 08 Nov 2014
Last visit: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
GPA: 3
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 61
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Insurance rate is fixed irrespective of the distance driven.This method allows ins co. to make profit.
Those who drive more also pay subsidized amount as compared to less driven.

All these conditions are fulfilled only when option B is satisfied.
avatar
luismmendivil
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Last visit: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How could I know to which level (500, 600, etc) does this question fit in?
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 21 Apr 2025
Posts: 5,965
Own Kudos:
5,156
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,965
Kudos: 5,156
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
luismmendivil
How could I know to which level (500, 600, etc) does this question fit in?

I suggest you go through these posts -

1. GMAT Critical Reasoning Question Directory by Topic & Difficulty

2. 150 Hardest Critical Reasoning Questions

These will give you an idea...
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 990
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 990
Kudos: 1,898
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
another assumption can be made is an assumption about the insurance price paid by drivers. Surely, that assumption has the same idea with the assumption in this question.
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,441
Own Kudos:
1,824
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,001
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,441
Kudos: 1,824
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kingb
In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
  
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia

  
(A) the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance

(B) the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average

(C) the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver

(D) Insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year

(E) Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers


Only B talks about "average cost and the driving distance"
User avatar
robu1
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Apr 2021
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 214
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
Posts: 94
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kindly explain how B is right answer and E is not.
avatar
jaisonsunny77
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 25 Aug 2021
Posts: 459
Own Kudos:
378
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 459
Kudos: 378
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance - this does not explain the conclusion.

B. the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average - we can infer from this that since the insurance cost incurred on insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average, the insurance company has more funds that it can allocate to drivers who drive more than the annual average. If the latter receives more financial support (in terms of reimbursements) from the insurance companies, then these drivers end up paying less from their pockets. (B) is therefore necessary to establish the conclusion. Hence, (B) is the right answer choice.

C. the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver
- irrelevant.

D. Insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year
- the conclusion is not concerned with 'how to increase' profitability of insurance companies.

E. Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers
- irrelevant to the conclusion drawn.
User avatar
krishsaisree
Joined: 19 May 2014
Last visit: 12 Nov 2023
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a support the conclusion question.

Conclusion: Avg. Insurance rate (IR) for people who drive less is lower than those who drive more. But premise also states that insurance rate is NOT dependent on distance driven.

A. the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance
--> This just states that average IR rises for everyone if new people sign up. Irrelevant. Discard

B. the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average
--> If IR is higher for people who drive more although it doesnt depend on distance (acc to regulation), this option states the reason--> It's due to the cost of getting the drivers insured on the company's side

C. the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver
--> Discard, nothing to do with the premise or conclusion

D. Insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year
-->Attacks the premise, discard!

E. Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers
--> Has nothing to do with premise/conclusion. Discard!
User avatar
emcheeks
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
108
 [2]
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 119
Kudos: 108
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I couldn't find any explanations that makes sense to me under this problem. So here is my take:

(B) The average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average.

It is very important to understand that the drivers who drive less and the ones who drive more pay about the same rate! How do we know that? -->

From stimulus, we know government regulate the insurance rates, and the rates are never dependent on mileage. THEREFORE, the drivers who drive less and the ones who drive more will either both have the same rate or have different rates based on other factors (car models, years, driver age etc.). However, the later one (car models, years, driver age etc.) is irrelevant in this problem. Therefore, we can assume that they have about the same rate!

(tbh, I feel that this is too much to think about especially when you are taking the actual test. But you can always approach to this answer by POE. But what I just said above is only for the sake of explaining this specific problem since I was really confused about this answer as well.)

Come back to the answer choice. Now we know two groups cost the same. And note that the average cost here is for the insurance companies not the customers! Therefore, from insurance companies' standpoint, let's say the cost for drivers who drive less is 100, but the cost for companies are 40. Then they would save the 60 bucks and use it on insuring the drivers who drive more. The drivers who drive less are indirectly subsidizing the people who drive more.

(E) Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers.

I chose this one at first. And this is how I understand it now:

From my analysis above about B, we get that two kinds of drivers cost about the same (which makes this choice wrong). BUT let's say you didn't know that when you are working on this problem:

Do we have to assume this? Negating this, drivers who drive pay more pay higher than those who drive less. However, even if drivers who drive more are paying more, that doesn't necessarily mean that the drivers who drive less are not subsidizing --> Negating this doesn't weaken the conclusion! Let's put them into simple figures:

Attachment:
Snip20200711_2.png
Snip20200711_2.png [ 17.46 KiB | Viewed 17482 times ]

Drivers who drive more are paying higher than the ones who drive less (negation example of E), and at the same time, cost to insurance companies on insuring those who drive more are a lot higher than those who drive less. From this table, we can tell the subsidizing thing actually does take place! Negation of E doesn't weaken the conclusion --> E is wrong.
User avatar
Ranasaymon
Joined: 24 Nov 2019
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 280
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 818
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 590 Q44 V27
GMAT 2: 600 Q46 V27
GMAT 3: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 4: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 4: 690 Q47 V37
Posts: 280
Kudos: 268
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
robu1
Kindly explain how B is right answer and E is not.

(E) Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers.

We are concerned with the drivers who drive less and those who drive more. Option E focuses on different kind of drivers. That's why E is incorrect.
User avatar
p456
Joined: 20 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Jun 2024
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 40
Kudos: 150
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I selected E at first. Then later realised beautiful word play of B. Here' my take on option B and why it is correct.(I never understood any of the above explanations)

we are told 1: "Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidise the insurance of those who drive more than average."
and
we are told 2: "insurance companies make reasonable profit."

=> we can say : those who drive less->pay more to insurance companies and who drive more->pay less.

B says that "cost to insurance companies from those who drive less is less than those who drive more" means those who drive less have minor damage so cost to insurance company is less and eventually they make more profit. Likewise we can say those who drive more have major damage, so cost to insurance company is more.

=> "Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidise the insurance of those who drive more than average."
User avatar
Sonia2023
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Last visit: 12 Nov 2024
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Other
Posts: 61
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kingb
In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
  
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia
  

(A) The average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance.

(B) The average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average.

(C) The lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver.

(D) Insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year.

(E) Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers.


This is a good question.

Conclusion: Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
Evidence: The rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year.

Now why is the author concluding that drivers who drive less are subsidizing the insurance premium for those who drive less? I can only assume this when I know that the costs of servicing is lower for those who drive less.

For instance:
Say X and Y both invest $100 and $1000 resp in shares through a wealth manager (WM). The WM charges a fixed fee of $10 each account. When can we say that X is kind of subsidizing the fees for Y? Only when the costs for servicing X ($4) is lower than Y ($6). Think about it. Because cost of servicing X is lower so premium for X should have been lower but she is paying more. Why? Because it helps the WM to balance the costs.

Now assume, the costs of servicing were same for X, then the same premium is justified. If the cost of servicing is higher for X than for Y, Y is subsidizing the payment for X.

Only B is the relevant choice which addresses this issue and relates to the right segments (who drive more and who drive less).
Let's negate the choice:

(B) The average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is equal /more than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average.
My conclusion is no longer valid. If the cost is higher for insuring drivers who drive less, then they are not subsidizing the premium paid by drivers who drive more. They are paying higher because the cost to service them is higher.

E was a contender for me at first.

(E) Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers.

We are just concerned with the premium amounts and not the claims.
Negate: Drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims generally do not pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers.
Here the argument is who drives less and who drives more and not about who takes more claims and who takes less. The segment is different.
User avatar
btsaami
Joined: 03 Feb 2023
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 574
Posts: 119
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.
Premise: Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year.
Assumption: cost related with the above two groups are almost same.
Question type: ASSUMPTION
Why correct? B) Exactly the same as assumption. Since the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average, are paying more premium and therefore subsidizing for those who drive more.
Why wrong? A) Out of scope as it just says new drivers have to pay more insurance (increasing the avg.) but doesn't answer whether drivers who drive less subsidize drivers who drive more.

(C) Out of scope-> doesn't mention whether is it because younger people drive more and others subsidize their premium as well.

(D) Classification of drivers to increase profits doesn't provide any information on whether customer driving less will still partially subsidize for drivers who drive more.

(E) Out of scope. This is talking about drivers who have caused insurance companies to pay costly claims and not generally who drive more.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts