It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 05:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston,MA

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 13:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
_________________

--gregspirited

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 14:17
gregspirited wrote:
unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

E?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2553

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 14:34
gregspirited wrote:
unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

I think id go with C.

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 14:36
Going with C.

The argument concludes that unemployed people have no financial incentive to get jobs since their total income is not going to exceed the government assistance anyways. But C provides that financial incentive... namely employed people can get higher paying jobs. So if the people get a first job somewhere they will likely be paid more for the next job.

E does not give people a financial incentive.

gregspirited wrote:
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 21:27
said C as well. Seemed to be the only one that linked the argument about the incentive, and stayed in scope

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston,MA

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2007, 05:10
OA is C. Thanks Guys
_________________

--gregspirited

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

20 Nov 2007, 05:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.