aditigene
Please help why D is wrong? Help me solve this Q.?
Argument: Board memebers set salaries of execs. But board memebers are themsleves execs from different organizations. Hence board members (execs from other companies/orgs) likely to decide on higher salaries for execs to set the exec salary bar higher (which in turn helps the members of the board)
(A) in medical malpractice suits, giving physicians not directly involved in a suit a major role in determining the damages due to successful plaintiffs
> Physicians not invovled in a medical malpractice suit have the say in determining damages for those (physicians) who are involved in a medical malpractice suit. Inference: Physicians likely to set the damage to lower amount as this would set the precedence for future such instances where other physicians might be part of a malpractice suit [Note the similarities to the original argument]
(B) in a legislature, allowing the legislators to increase their own salaries only if at least two-thirds of them vote in favor of an increase
>Legislators determine the change themselves. There isn't a "supposed" conflict of interest in this scenario.
(C) to work both fast and accurately by paying them by the piece but counting only pieces of acceptable quality
> this isn't similar to the argument provided
(D) in a sports competition decided by judges’ scores, selecting the judges from among people retired from that sport after successful careers
> Judges have nothing to gain from this arrangement (as per the original argument, the accomodation is compromised because the board memebers gain when exec salaries increase)
(E) in a business organization, distributing a group bonus among the members of a task force on the basis of a confidential evaluation by each member of the contribution made by each of the others
> Distribution of a group bonus based on confidential eval will not result in a profit for all scenario as described in the argument.
I hope this helps