Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(01:02)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 4
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In our solar system only one of the nine planets-Earth-qualifies as fit to sustain life. Nonetheless, using this ratio, and considering the astonishingly large number of planetary systems in the universe, we must conclude that the number of planets fit to sustain some form of life is extremely large.
The argument is questionable because it presumes which one of the following without providing justification?
(A) If a planet is Earthlike, then life will arise on it. (B) our solar system is similar to many other planetary systems in the universe. (C) The conditions necessary for life to begin are well understood. (D) Life similar to Earth's could evolve under conditions very different from those on Earth. (E) Most other planetary systems in the universe have nine planets.
Source : LSAT Prep Test 31
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
In our solar system only one of the nine planets-Earth-qualifies as fit to sustain life. Nonetheless, using this ratio, and considering the astonishingly large number of planetary systems in the universe, we must conclude that the number of planets fit to sustain some form of life is extremely large.
The argument is questionable because it presumes which one of the following without providing justification?
(A) If a planet is Earthlike, then life will arise on it. the conclusion never refers to the number of planets were life WILL arise, just the number of planets "fit to sustain some form of life" (B) our solar system is similar to many other planetary systems in the universe. i think this one is correct, since some other planetary systems in the universe could be completely different from ours and thus the assumption that the ratio of 1:8 for planets fit to sustain life versus planets not fit wouldn't be applicable (C) The conditions necessary for life to begin are well understood. random/out of scope (D) Life similar to Earth's could evolve under conditions very different from those on Earth. the argument uses the opposite of this assumption as its basis so this one doesn't hold. (E) Most other planetary systems in the universe have nine planets. the argument doesn't necessarily require that all or most other systems also have nine planets since it's just applying a ratio.
(A) If a planet is Earthlike, then life will arise on it. – I think this is required in the statements as if the any other planet in other solar system is like earth then life may arise on it (B) our solar system is similar to many other planetary systems in the universe. – similarity in solar system will not help but similarity in the conditions on earth will help. (C) The conditions necessary for life to begin are well understood. – out of scope (D) Life similar to Earth's could evolve under conditions very different from those on Earth. – we are not talking about different conditions (E) Most other planetary systems in the universe have nine planets. – this will not help for the argument
A looks like a trap. B for me. not A because argument only talks about other planets being 'fit' for life and not whether life will actually arise on it. OA?
Surely B... based on the ratio in solar system, writer is making a conclusion for the whole universe. This means, he is assuming solar system and universe are very similar.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.