Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:02 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
300
 [21]
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
 [21]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
StevenSzekeres
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Last visit: 26 Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
11
 [7]
Posts: 6
Kudos: 11
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Leopard
Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Last visit: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
55
 [4]
Posts: 73
Kudos: 55
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) criticize the motives of those who use risky financial strategies - The author is not criticizing. Hence, ruled out.
(B) challenge a common perception of financiers. She is just describing, not challenging. Hence, ruled out.
(C) describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device. This is the answer. She describes when the leverage evolved and how it is applied. The word certain adds more strength here.
(D) explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period. This is a very good tricky answer. I may chose this other times. The author never says about the popularity of leveraged buyouts. He never says why so many people chose this and how others were attracted. Instead, he says how few companies were doomed because of it.
(E) argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to overall financial health. Author never states this.

:evil: I saw the official answer before explaining. :twisted:
User avatar
siddhans
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Last visit: 04 Sep 2012
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
786
 [2]
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 158
Kudos: 786
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sondenso
terp06
In the early to mid-1980s, a business practice known as a "leveraged buyout" became popular as a method for companies to expand without having to spend any of their own assets. The leveraged buyout was not without its problems, however, and in time it came to represent in the public imagination not only corporate ingenuity and success, but also excess and greed. Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.
A leveraged buyout entails one company purchasing another using the assets of the purchased company as the collateral to secure the funds needed to buy that company. The leveraged buyout allows companies to take on debt that their own assets would have been insufficient to secure in order to finance expansion. The benefit of the leveraged buyout is obvious: companies with insufficient funds can still expand to compete with larger competitors. The drawbacks, however, became apparent only after the fact: the purchased company must perform extraordinarily well in order to generate the capital to pay off the loans that made the purchase possible in the first place. When the purchased company underperforms, the buyer must somehow find the money to pay off the loans. If such funds are not obtained, the buyer may be forced to sell off the company, or parts thereof, for less than the purchase price. In these cases, the buyer is still responsible for repaying the debt that is not covered by the sale price. Many of these deals resulted in the evisceration of the purchased companies, as subparts were sold to pay down the loans and employees were laid off to reduce costs and increase profits.
The most famous leveraged buyout is probably the 1988 purchase of RJR Nabisco by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts ("KKR"). The purchase price for the corporate giant RJR Nabisco was $25 billion, almost all of which was borrowed money. The takeover was "hostile," meaning that RJR Nabisco resisted any overtures from potential buyers. KKR ultimately succeeded by buying a controlling interest in RJR Nabisco, thereby obtaining voting control over the company. By the mid-1990s, though, KKR had seen a reversal of fortune and was forced to sell off RJR Nabisco in order to relieve itself of the crushing debt load.

The 1980s were the heyday of the leveraged buyout, as lending institutions were willing to loan money for these ventures. When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.


----------------------------------------------------------------

The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) criticize the motives of those who use risky financial strategies
(B) challenge a common perception of financiers
(C) describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device
(D) explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period
(E) argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to overall financial health


Why is E wrong? The passage criticizes more than praises about LBO???
avatar
aseemdabur
Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Last visit: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Posts: 4
Kudos: 3
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A criticize the motives of those who use risky financial
strategies
B challenge a common perception of financiers
C describe the evolution and application of a certain
financial device
D explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a
certain period
E argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to
overall financial health

EXPLANATION FOR C
JUSTIFICATION FOR WORD EVOLUTION - In the early to mid-1980s, a business practice known as a
“leveraged buyout” became popular as a method for
companies

JUSTIFICATION FOR WORD APPLICATION - The most famous leveraged buyout is probably the 1988
purchase of RJR Nabisco by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts
(“KKR”)


EXPLANATION FOR D
DOESN'T ONLY EXPLAIN POPULARITY BUT ALSO THE BENEFITS AND LOSSES AND ALSO LOSS OF POPULARITY IN LATE 1980s

EXPLANATION FOR E
leveraged buyouts are NOT ONLY detrimental BUT ALSO GOOD FOR FINANCIAL HEALTH (SUPPORT)Many of the main
corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises


SO THE BEST POSSIBLE ANSWER PROVIDED IS C
DO CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG
User avatar
bidmanager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Last visit: 23 Jul 2012
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 19
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C.

The passage talks about how LB evolved as a method and how it was put into use in 1980s. The author not only discusses the popularity of the method, but also the drawbacks of the method since the opening paragraph of the passage.
User avatar
AccipiterQ
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Last visit: 03 Sep 2020
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
715
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 670 Q39 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Where does it talk about them evolving, it just describes what they are and why they were popular. OA should be D on this one.
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,008
Own Kudos:
3,015
 [2]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,008
Kudos: 3,015
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
how can they use the term financial device for a business practice known as a "leveraged buyout".
Can someone explain?
User avatar
AryamaDuttaSaikia
User avatar
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Dec 2019
Posts: 252
Own Kudos:
693
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Location: India
Posts: 252
Kudos: 693
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Mechmeera,

The usage of device is in the context of the question. Device as a tool or practice in the financial domain. Also, option C clearly sums the intent of the author in a more generic way (typical pattern of correct answer choice in GMAT RC primary purpose questions).
Hope it helps!
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,008
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,008
Kudos: 3,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AryamaDuttaSaikia
Hi Mechmeera,

The usage of device is in the context of the question. Device as a tool or practice in the financial domain. Also, option C clearly sums the intent of the author in a more generic way (typical pattern of correct answer choice in GMAT RC primary purpose questions).
Hope it helps!

hi AryamaDuttaSaikia,

I agree with you that Option C sums the intent of the author in better way then others do.
But I just got confused when he used financial device term and i thought this is new word which did not exist in the passage.
What can we do in case of surprises like this in an RC passage?
How am I supposed to infer that financial device refers to business practice i.e., "leveraged buyout" in the exam.
User avatar
AryamaDuttaSaikia
User avatar
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Dec 2019
Posts: 252
Own Kudos:
693
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Location: India
Posts: 252
Kudos: 693
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are 2 things over here:

- In primary purpose questions - focus more on the overall context than on the individual words.

- One of the best strategies to solve primary purpose is to do Process Of Elimination. Do not think of the right answer but eliminate wrong answer. (Keep the paragraph summaries in mind to zero in to the passage summary)
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,149
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Reformatted question, added 2 others questions and OAs, added tags. Enjoy :-D
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the passage is easy to read and understand. however, the question 1 and 2 contain close answers. we have to spend long time to differentiate the close answers to go to the oa.

we spend less time on reading passage and more time on answering questions.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,961
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) criticize the motives of those who use risky financial strategies -- Incorrect

(B) challenge a common perception of financiers -- incorrect - no common perception has been challenged

(C) describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device -- hold this --

(D) explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period -- though this is true, it is not the main purpose

(E) argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to overall financial health --
Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.

When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.

I was in fix between C and E and ended up choosing option E . Can you please explain why C is the correct option?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert -- please help
User avatar
MagooshExpert
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Last visit: 15 Jan 2020
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 231
Kudos: 436
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) criticize the motives of those who use risky financial strategies -- Incorrect

(B) challenge a common perception of financiers -- incorrect - no common perception has been challenged

(C) describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device -- hold this --

(D) explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period -- though this is true, it is not the main purpose

(E) argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to overall financial health --
Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.

When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.

I was in fix between C and E and ended up choosing option E . Can you please explain why C is the correct option?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert -- please help

Hi Skywalker18!

Happy to help :-)

On the GMAT, always beware of answers that are very black-and-white. If we look through the passage, we see many indications that leveraged buyouts are BOTH good and bad for financial health:

it came to represent in the public imagination not only corporate ingenuity and success, but also excess and greed.
Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.
The benefit of the leveraged buyout is obvious
The drawbacks, however, became apparent only after the fact

So the reality is a lot more nuanced than simply saying that leveraged buyouts are 100% bad financial decisions. According to the passage, there were potential positive results of leveraged buyouts -- they were just overall risky (not necessarily always bad). Choice C fits perfectly here, but choice E is just too extreme to fit the passage.

Hope that helps! :-)
-Carolyn
User avatar
JS1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,101
Posts: 236
Kudos: 266
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE for Q1

The answer to a question that asks about "primary purpose" must take the entirety of the passage into account. Since the author never states an opinion about the subject of the passage, the primary purpose of the passage cannot be characterized by any verb that requires an opinion.

(A) This choice begins with "criticize", which requires an opinion.

(B)This choice begins with "challenge", which requires an opinion.

(C) CORRECT. The passage was concerned with describing how leveraged buyouts are used and how their status changed over time. This is reflected in this choice.

(D) This choice begins with "explain", which is neutral. However, the passage as a whole was not concerned with the "popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period."

(E) This choice begins with "argue," which requires an opinion.
User avatar
JS1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,101
Posts: 236
Kudos: 266
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE for Q2

The question itself is rather broad, so the best approach is to evaluate the choices and compare each one to the passage.

(A) The passage does not imply this.

(B) CORRECT. The reference to the sale of RJR Nabisco provides support for this choice. Presumably, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts did not purchase RJR Nabisco with the intention of having to sell it to pay off the loans used to buy it.

(C) Though tempting, this choice is incorrect because we do not have any information in the passage about the attitude of the banks towards leveraged buyouts today, only about their attitude during and immediately after their period of greatest popularity. Also, the language in this answer ("No banks . . .") is too extreme to be correct.

(D) The passage does not imply this.

(E) The passage does not imply this.
User avatar
JS1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
266
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,101
Posts: 236
Kudos: 266
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE for Q3
The question itself is rather broad, so the best approach is to evaluate the choices and compare each one to the passage.

(A) The passage does not imply this.

(B) CORRECT. The reference to the sale of RJR Nabisco provides support for this choice. Presumably, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts did not purchase RJR Nabisco with the intention of having to sell it to pay off the loans used to buy it.

(C) Though tempting, this choice is incorrect because we do not have any information in the passage about the attitude of the banks towards leveraged buyouts today, only about their attitude during and immediately after their period of greatest popularity. Also, the language in this answer ("No banks . . .") is too extreme to be correct.

(D) The passage does not imply this.

(E) The passage does not imply this.
User avatar
Adi93
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Jun 2018
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Status:EAT SLEEP GMAT REPEAT!
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 107
Kudos: 238
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi csaluja,

Instead of OE for 2 you have mentioned OE for 3 again. Kindly correct it

+1 if this helps!

csaluja
OE for Q2

The question itself is rather broad, so the best approach is to evaluate the choices and compare each one to the passage.

(A) The passage does not imply this.

(B) CORRECT. The reference to the sale of RJR Nabisco provides support for this choice. Presumably, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts did not purchase RJR Nabisco with the intention of having to sell it to pay off the loans used to buy it.

(C) Though tempting, this choice is incorrect because we do not have any information in the passage about the attitude of the banks towards leveraged buyouts today, only about their attitude during and immediately after their period of greatest popularity. Also, the language in this answer ("No banks . . .") is too extreme to be correct.

(D) The passage does not imply this.

(E) The passage does not imply this.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts