Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 14

In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 30
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 03 Jul 2013, 03:07
Question Stats:
65% (02:51) correct 35% (03:05) wrong based on 347 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails. In the second quarter of 2008, the store sold 375 hammers and 18,000 nails. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease from the first quarter to the second quarter. A. 0.4% B. 2.1% C. 2.5% D. 17% E. 25%
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by mustu on 07 Jul 2011, 08:00.
Last edited by Bunuel on 03 Jul 2013, 03:07, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question added the answer choices and OA.




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 10105
Location: Pune, India

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2011, 21:08
mustu wrote: Hello, A store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails on year 0 and 375 hammers and 18,000 nails on year 1. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease? I have picked up this question from the MGMAT offical guide. OA = 16.7% Can someone please explain me the steps to reach the solution. I am lost in the middle .. Regards Mustu Another approach: The number of hammers increased by 25%. Number of nails increased by 50%. The new ratio is 1.25/1.5 = 5/6 as compared to 1 before. Hence it decreased by 1/6 which is 16.67%
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >




Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 15

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2011, 14:55
There's an easier way to do it. 300h + 1200n in year 0 375h + 1800n in year 1 75h+600n is the difference 75/600 = 1/8 or 16.67




Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 437

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2011, 08:12
mustu wrote: Hello, A store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails on year 0 and 375 hammers and 18,000 nails on year 1. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease? I have picked up this question from the MGMAT offical guide. OA = 16.7% Can someone please explain me the steps to reach the solution. I am lost in the middle .. Regards Mustu The old ratio was 1:400 (300:12000) new ratio is 1:480 (375:18000) change = 1400/480 = 1.83333 =16.7% or 1/400 = .0025 1/480 = .00208 1 .00208/.0025=16.7%



Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 14

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2011, 08:30
sudhir18n wrote: The old ratio was 1:400 (300:12000) new ratio is 1:480 (375:18000)
change = 1400/480 = 1.83333 =16.7% or 1/400 = .0025 1/480 = .00208 1 .00208/.0025=16.7%
Hi Sudhir, Why do u take it as 1400/480 ?? This is the step that i am not understanding. Original  change = New > We have original as 1/40 and change as 1/48. So change = Original  New 1/40  1/48 right ? Should we consider original as 100% ( 1 ) and thats the reason? Regards Mustu



Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 437

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2011, 08:45
mustu wrote: sudhir18n wrote: The old ratio was 1:400 (300:12000) new ratio is 1:480 (375:18000)
change = 1400/480 = 1.83333 =16.7% or 1/400 = .0025 1/480 = .00208 1 .00208/.0025=16.7%
Hi Sudhir, Why do u take it as 1400/480 ?? This is the step that i am not understanding. Original  change = New > We have original as 1/40 and change as 1/48. So change = Original  New 1/40  1/48 right ? Should we consider original as 100% ( 1 ) and thats the reason? Regards Mustu I should have taken 40 and 48 and not 400 and 480. your formula is right , but that will give u only the absolute value of change and % change for percent change change% = ( original  new)/orginal * 100 =( 1/40  1/48)/1/40 * 100 solve this and you will get a negative 16.7 % , which means a decrease of 16.7 %



Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 523

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2011, 14:27
year 0 > H/N = 300/12000 = 1/40
year 1 > H/N = 375/18000 = (1/40)(150/180)
% decrease = (1/40)(1150/180) *100 / (1/40)
=16.67%



Retired Thread Master
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 463

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2011, 16:51
I made it until .00208/.0025, my answer was .20
The problem said "APPROXIMATELY" so I stopped at .20 (which should have been .208)
I mean, 375/18000 is .00208, but my approximate is .0020 (I stopped bec it said APPROXIMATE)
1.0020/.0025 is 20%, as compared to the answer, 1.00208/.0025, which is 16.7%.
16% is a huge diff from 20%. I thought when they used the word "APPROXIMATELY", I could estimate like that. How do I avoid this problem again? How do you know when to estimate like that or not? I guess if they show the answer choices, I'll get it. But I want to be sure.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 10105
Location: Pune, India

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jul 2011, 03:07
gablaze23 wrote: I made it until .00208/.0025, my answer was .20
The problem said "APPROXIMATELY" so I stopped at .20 (which should have been .208)
I mean, 375/18000 is .00208, but my approximate is .0020 (I stopped bec it said APPROXIMATE)
1.0020/.0025 is 20%, as compared to the answer, 1.00208/.0025, which is 16.7%.
16% is a huge diff from 20%. I thought when they used the word "APPROXIMATELY", I could estimate like that. How do I avoid this problem again? How do you know when to estimate like that or not? I guess if they show the answer choices, I'll get it. But I want to be sure. They use the word 'approximate' because 16.67% is an approximation of 1/6. You cannot approximate .00208 to be .0020 since the denominator is .0025 which is quite close to .00208. If you do want to approximate, you can use .0021 instead. Of course, options will help.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 113

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jul 2011, 03:39
gablaze23 wrote: I made it until .00208/.0025, my answer was .20
The problem said "APPROXIMATELY" so I stopped at .20 (which should have been .208)
I mean, 375/18000 is .00208, but my approximate is .0020 (I stopped bec it said APPROXIMATE)
1.0020/.0025 is 20%, as compared to the answer, 1.00208/.0025, which is 16.7%.
16% is a huge diff from 20%. I thought when they used the word "APPROXIMATELY", I could estimate like that. How do I avoid this problem again? How do you know when to estimate like that or not? I guess if they show the answer choices, I'll get it. But I want to be sure. Agree. There are no variants in the question. In case if there will be a big gap btw possible answer the one can save some time.



Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 111
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07162012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2011, 09:22
Year 0 > 300/12000= 1/40 year 1 > 375/18000 = 1/48 %change = (1/40 1/48)/1/40 *100 = 16.6666
_________________
Analyze why option A in SC wrong



Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11202011
GPA: 3.6
WE: Business Development (Other)

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2011, 10:33
% Decrease = 100  New Ratio/Old Ratio x 100 100  375/18*12/300*100 16.67%



Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2011
Posts: 16

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2013, 01:49
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: mustu wrote: Hello, A store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails on year 0 and 375 hammers and 18,000 nails on year 1. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease? I have picked up this question from the MGMAT offical guide. OA = 16.7% Can someone please explain me the steps to reach the solution. I am lost in the middle .. Regards Mustu Another approach: The number of hammers increased by 25%. Number of nails increased by 50%. The new ratio is 1.25/1.5 = 5/6 as compared to 1 before. Hence it decreased by 1/6 which is 16.67% Karishma, This is a fantastic approach. Would this work even though hammers are increasing and nails are decreasing in % something like The number of hammers increased by 25%. Number of nails decreased by 50%. The new ratio  1.25/0.5 ?



Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2011
Posts: 16

Re: Percent and Weighted averages
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2013, 02:03
nishtil wrote: Year 0 > 300/12000= 1/40 year 1 > 375/18000 = 1/48
%change = (1/40 1/48)/1/40 *100 = 16.6666 Before coming to this post, I was thinking why hasn't anybody solved the problem this way. I solved this way but after looking at other solutions I thought I got answer by fluke



SVP
Status: The Best Or Nothing
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 1714
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: A store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails on year 0 and 375
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jul 2013, 02:26
300/12000 = 1/40 375/18000 = 1/48
1/40 got reduced to (1/401/48), so 100 would get reduced to:
{100 x (1/401/48)} / (1/40) = 100 x { (4840) / 48 x 40 } x 40 = 100 x 8 / 48 = 16.66



Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2016
Posts: 6

Re: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 30
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Feb 2016, 14:00
imerial wrote: There's an easier way to do it. 300h + 1200n in year 0 375h + 1800n in year 1 75h+600n is the difference 75/600 = 1/8 or 16.67 I dont think 1/8 equals 16.67



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 11 Sep 2015
Posts: 4320
Location: Canada

In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 30
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 12 Nov 2019, 16:27
mustu wrote: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails. In the second quarter of 2008, the store sold 375 hammers and 18,000 nails. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease from the first quarter to the second quarter.
A. 0.4% B. 2.1% C. 2.5% D. 17% E. 25% 1st quarter: hammers/nails = 300/12,000 = 150/60002nd quarter: hammers/nails = 375/18,000 = 125/6000ASIDE: It's useful to write both ratios with the same denominator. This allows us to IGNORE the denominator and focus solely on the numerators. So, our ratio went from 150/6000 to 125/6000 Ignoring the denominators, we went from 150 to 125The percent change = 100(difference in values)/(original value) = (100)( 150  125)/ 150= (100)(25)/150) = (100)(1)/(6) = 100/6 ≈ 16.666... Answer: D
_________________
Test confidently with gmatprepnow.com
Originally posted by GMATPrepNow on 11 Sep 2016, 14:39.
Last edited by GMATPrepNow on 12 Nov 2019, 16:27, edited 1 time in total.



Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2016
Posts: 7

Re: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 30
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Nov 2016, 04:17
GMATPrepNow wrote: mustu wrote: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails. In the second quarter of 2008, the store sold 375 hammers and 18,000 nails. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease from the first quarter to the second quarter.
A. 0.4% B. 2.1% C. 2.5% D. 17% E. 25% 1st quarter: hammers/nails = 300/12,000 = 150/60002nd quarter: hammers/nails = 375/18,000 = 125/6000ASIDE: It's useful to write both ratios with the same denominator. This allows us to IGNORE the denominator and focus solely on the numerators. So, our ratio went from 150/6000 to 125/6000 Ignoring the denominators, we went from 150 to 125The percent change = 100(difference in values)/(original value) = (100)( 150  125)/ 150= (100)(25)/150) = (100)(1)/(6) = 100/6 ≈ 16.666... Answer: [youtube]D[/youtube] Would you mind explaining how you got those 6000 ie common denominator under 2 minutes? What approach did you take?



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 9426
Location: United States (CA)

Re: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 30
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2019, 10:54
mustu wrote: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 300 hammers and 12,000 nails. In the second quarter of 2008, the store sold 375 hammers and 18,000 nails. By approximately what percent did the ratio of hammers sold to nails sold decrease from the first quarter to the second quarter.
A. 0.4% B. 2.1% C. 2.5% D. 17% E. 25% The ratio of hammers to nails in the first quarter was 300/12,000 = 3/120 = 1/40. The ratio of hammers to nails in the second quarter was 375/18,000 = 1/48. We can use the percent change formula: (New  Old)/Old x 100 to create the equation: (375/18,000  300/12,000)/(300/12,000) x 100 (1/48  1/40)/(1/40) x 100 (5/240  6/240)/(1/40) x 100 1/240 x 40 x 100 = 1/6 x 100 = 16.67%, which is approximately a 17% decrease. Answer: D
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.




Re: In the first quarter of 2008, Harry's Hardware Store sold 30
[#permalink]
27 Nov 2019, 10:54






