GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jul 2018, 14:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 124
In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 22 Oct 2016, 07:15
3
4
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (00:54) correct 24% (00:58) wrong based on 707 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is spent on health care, while in Britain the amount is about half that. A recent study indicated that middle-aged white Americans have a significantly higher rate of diabetes and heart disease than do middle-aged white Britons. Even after eliminating from the study the lifestyle differences of diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking, the data showed that the Americans have poorer health than their British counterparts.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%.
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases.
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively.
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general.
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.

Originally posted by Orange08 on 19 Sep 2010, 07:30.
Last edited by Skywalker18 on 22 Oct 2016, 07:15, edited 1 time in total.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 125
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2010, 21:17
10
5
For this type of inference/draw a conclusion question (and when you see the phrase "best supports which of the following" it generally means you are dealing with that kind of question)-- you always want to stay *as close to the specific wording of the argument as possible.* One of GMAC's favorite tricks is coming up with conclusions that most reasonable people would draw but are not necessarily true given the exact wording of the argument. It's often the teeny tiny words, which casual/speedy readers gloss over, that are the key to knowing in black/white terms whether an answer choice is wrong.

These answers are riddled with classic distortions of the seemingly reasonable type. Choices A and B contain common "red flag" words-- whenever you see these words, perk up and pay extra attention.

(A) "should be"-- if you are inferring that something SHOULD BE done--a recommendation-- make sure that the argument itself has that thrust. Here the entire argument is a list of facts and there is no recommendation made.

(B) "causes" -- causality is always something to be suspicious of, and even more so when there is only correlational evidence. Remember what your high school science teacher said: "Correlation does not imply causation." Here there is only correlational information.

Choice (C) is something that a reasonable person might think in the non-GMAT world. In the US right now, this is a huge argument being made-- "Look at the rest of the world! Why are we spending more but seeing an increasingly less healthy population?" BUT the very specific wording of this conclusion sets the argument scope around the EFFECTIVENESS of spending...there is nothing mentioned in the argument about effectiveness. Also, I've found in the past that it's often useful to be suspicious of answers that are in the popular consciousness in a large way-- people are attracted to the familiar, and the test writers know this.

Choice (D) uses another familiar trick-- take words from the argument and jumble them around a little. The comparison in the statement is between middle-aged white Americans and middle-aged white Britons-- the comparison in (D) is between two different types of Americans.

Choice (E), as Dawgie states above, says almost exactly the same thing as the last sentence in the stimulus. It might even seem too suspiciously obvious for some test-takers. But the correct answer for this type of question is the one that requires the smallest possible jump in logic, and (E) does this.

The more you do these, the more quickly you'll be able to spot these tiny words and the traps laid out for you. I'm guessing that many of the posters above, after reading the argument, were able to POE through the answer choices in less than 30 seconds. If it takes you longer right now-- don't lose heart-- keep practicing identifying those little words and your speed will pick up as your pattern recognition skills refine.
_________________

JP Park | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Los Angeles

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

##### General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2010, 09:56
After POE of irrelevant answers or such that are "far" from the data given I was left with C & E.
I eventually chose C. I disqualified E because it states something that cannot be inferred from the data, it might be something other than diet,exercise,smoking and drinking but it might not be.
C makes a connection between the first and the second parts of the question's stem.
What's the OA?
_________________

Consider Kudos if my post helped you. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My TOEFL Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-toefl-experience-99884.html
My GMAT Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-730-10-luck-20-skill-15-concentrated-power-of-will-104473.html

Director
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 642
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2010, 10:01
why is e wrong? is it because it is stated in the argument? what if americans are generally unhealthy because of genetics etc... not an external factor, so that is accounted for in E
_________________

Consider kudos, they are good for health

Director
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 508
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2010, 10:03
Orange08 wrote:
In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is spent on health care, while in Britain the amount is about half that. A recent study indicated that middle-aged white Americans have a significantly higher rate of diabetes and heart disease than do middle-aged white Britons. Even after eliminating from the study the lifestyle differences of diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking, the data showed that the Americans have poorer health than their British counterparts.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%.
Nothing in the stimulus suggests this.
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases.
Nothing in the stimulus suggests this.
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively.
Nothing in the stimulus suggests this.
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general.
Nothing in the stimulus suggests this, there is a comparison of middle aged Americans vs Britons though.
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.
Pretty much what the last sentence says, Correct!

Also what is the source of this question?
_________________

It's a dawg eat dawg world.

Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1784
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2010, 11:46
i agree it is E. since this is controlled then other factors apply
_________________

Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 189
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2010, 21:39
Hurray, I pick E.

I was quite confused by D, because there was a distinction between WHITE american, WHITE briton and then THE american and The briton.

After long thought, the spending was not metioned, so E remains.
Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 540
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 05:42
parker wrote:
For this type of inference/draw a conclusion question (and when you see the phrase "best supports which of the following" it generally means you are dealing with that kind of question)-- you always want to stay *as close to the specific wording of the argument as possible.* One of GMAC's favorite tricks is coming up with conclusions that most reasonable people would draw but are not necessarily true given the exact wording of the argument. It's often the teeny tiny words, which casual/speedy readers gloss over, that are the key to knowing in black/white terms whether an answer choice is wrong.

These answers are riddled with classic distortions of the seemingly reasonable type. Choices A and B contain common "red flag" words-- whenever you see these words, perk up and pay extra attention.

(A) "should be"-- if you are inferring that something SHOULD BE done--a recommendation-- make sure that the argument itself has that thrust. Here the entire argument is a list of facts and there is no recommendation made.

(B) "causes" -- causality is always something to be suspicious of, and even more so when there is only correlational evidence. Remember what your high school science teacher said: "Correlation does not imply causation." Here there is only correlational information.

Choice (C) is something that a reasonable person might think in the non-GMAT world. In the US right now, this is a huge argument being made-- "Look at the rest of the world! Why are we spending more but seeing an increasingly less healthy population?" BUT the very specific wording of this conclusion sets the argument scope around the EFFECTIVENESS of spending...there is nothing mentioned in the argument about effectiveness. Also, I've found in the past that it's often useful to be suspicious of answers that are in the popular consciousness in a large way-- people are attracted to the familiar, and the test writers know this.

Choice (D) uses another familiar trick-- take words from the argument and jumble them around a little. The comparison in the statement is between middle-aged white Americans and middle-aged white Britons-- the comparison in (D) is between two different types of Americans.

Choice (E), as Dawgie states above, says almost exactly the same thing as the last sentence in the stimulus. It might even seem too suspiciously obvious for some test-takers. But the correct answer for this type of question is the one that requires the smallest possible jump in logic, and (E) does this.

The more you do these, the more quickly you'll be able to spot these tiny words and the traps laid out for you. I'm guessing that many of the posters above, after reading the argument, were able to POE through the answer choices in less than 30 seconds. If it takes you longer right now-- don't lose heart-- keep practicing identifying those little words and your speed will pick up as your pattern recognition skills refine.

Excellent explanation tie was between C and E. Fantastic explanation deserves KUDOS.
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 192
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2014, 23:10
Orange08 wrote:
In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is spent on health care, while in Britain the amount is about half that. A recent study indicated that middle-aged white Americans have a significantly higher rate of diabetes and heart disease than do middle-aged white Britons. Even after eliminating from the study the lifestyle differences of diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking, the data showed that the Americans have poorer health than their British counterparts.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%.
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases.
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively.
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general.
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.

E for sure, after eliminating lifestyle differences, the result still showed that the Americans have poorer health --> there must be other causes for that result.
_________________

.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post

Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2015
Posts: 70
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2016, 15:55
The health care costs given in the argument are the average costs per person per year in each nation, yet the study only looked at the health of middle-aged white people. It is unclear exactly what amount of money is spent on health care for the age group and race studied. For example, the average healthcare spending in the United States may include dramatically higher costs for care of premature infants, so it is possible that health care expenditures for the middle-aged white Americans in the study are actually the same as, or even less than, expenditures for their British counterparts.

C - It is possible that health care in the United States costs more because the money is being used ineffectively. This assertion is one potential explanation for the poorer health of the Americans in the study, despite apparently higher spending on health care. However, more information is needed to conclusively make this assertion, such as proving that money is currently being wasted, and on what. Additionally, it is unclear exactly how much money is spent on health
care for the age group and race studied, so the poorer health of the American patients does not necessarily tell us anything about the effectiveness of the money spent on them.

E - CORRECT. The study revealed some differences in the health of middle aged white Americans and middle-aged white Britons. The study did not indicatethe reason for the difference. However, the researchers did eliminate the lifestyle
differences of diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking as causes of the health difference. Thus, it can be conclusively asserted that something else (other than diet, exercise, smoking and drinking) must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.

Hope it helps!
Moderator
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 1053
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2016, 12:31
We are spending double in US and still higher rate of disease found in american not in britons.

A Argument does not say US should reduce or not.
B Irrelevant. nowhere in the argument this is provided.
C how do we know the higher rate of disease in america is because money is not utilized well. there could be various other reasons.
D we do not know the number of people. we cannot compare averages.
E yes, if the provided lifestyle differences are not considered and data still showed that americans have poorer health then there must be some other reason. - correct
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 774
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2017, 18:22
Orange08 wrote:
In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is spent on health care, while in Britain the amount is about half that. A recent study indicated that middle-aged white Americans have a significantly higher rate of diabetes and heart disease than do middle-aged white Britons. Even after eliminating from the study the lifestyle differences of diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking, the data showed that the Americans have poorer health than their British counterparts.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%.
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases.
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively.
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general.
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.

They key here is process of elimination- I remember my Bus Law professor, a lady who taught at Wharton and score 700+, that the answers for the harder questions don't always fit like puzzle pieces. What can we rule out?

a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%. Why? Health care spending in the U.S could be appropriate-
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases. A higher incidence of certain diseases could be the cause of higher health care- this can equally be conclude on the basis of the info provided
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively. We don't know that. Maybe it is being used effectively but people in the United States are just reluctant to change their eating happens hence the higher cost of health care spending
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general. the information provided actually suggests the opposite
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.[/quote] yes
Senior Manager
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 267
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2018, 12:41
a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%. Text does not say that
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases. Out of context
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively. No proof for this statement
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general. No data supports this statement
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study. correct
_________________

Please give kudos if you like my post.Thanks

Manager
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 94
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2018, 03:12
a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%. - Out of Scope as nowhere it is mentioned
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases. Out of Scope as nowhere it is mentioned
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively. We cannot infer that money is used ineffectively
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general. We cannot compare averages here
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study. CORRECT if the parameters mentioned are excluded and still data shows difference in health of two groups then it means something other than these parameters have resulted in difference.
_________________

Never Settle for something less than what you deserve...........

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+

VP
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1143
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2018, 07:16
Orange08 wrote:
In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is spent on health care, while in Britain the amount is about half that. A recent study indicated that middle-aged white Americans have a significantly higher rate of diabetes and heart disease than do middle-aged white Britons. Even after eliminating from the study the lifestyle differences of diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking, the data showed that the Americans have poorer health than their British counterparts.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?

a) Health care spending in the United States should be reduced by 50%.
b) More expensive health care causes a higher incidence of certain diseases.
c) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively.
d) The average health care spending for middle-aged white Americans is probably less than the average health care spending for Americans in general.
e) Something other than diet, exercise, smoking, and drinking must account for the difference in health for the two groups in the study.

A. No such suggestion - Out of scope be
B. Can't be inferred - Out of scope
C. Too much inference
D. Comparison is between US and British people
E. Correct as per last statement

Hence (E)
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

Re: In the United States, about \$5,200 per person per year is &nbs [#permalink] 04 Apr 2018, 07:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.