GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 17:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1732
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2017, 10:35
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

78% (01:48) correct 22% (01:54) wrong based on 173 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Source: McGraw hill GMAT: 2013

In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality, it is not. The explanation is that 80 percent of the country’s rich estuaries are owned by the government. This hurts Ecuador’s shrimp production, because the government does not have the flexibility necessary for efficient shrimp farming that private industry possesses

The answer to which of the following questions would be most relevant to evaluating the adequacy of the explanation given above?

A. Who owns the 20 percent of estuaries that are not owned by the government?
B. What percentage of Ecuador’s production of shrimp is consumed domestically?
C. Has the government stated any plans to sell any of its estuaries to private industry, provided that the price is sufficient?
D. Is Peru, Ecuador’s neighbor to the south, actually better suited for commercial shrimp farming than Ecuador, which is a substantially smaller country?
E. How does Ecuador’s shrimp production on government-owned estuaries compare to that on comparable land owned by private industry?

_________________

Official PS Practice Questions
Press +1 Kudos if this post is helpful

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2017, 16:54
2
SajjadAhmad wrote:
Source: McGraw hill GMAT: 2013

In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality, it is not. The explanation is that 80 percent of the country’s rich estuaries are owned by the government. This hurts Ecuador’s shrimp production, because the government does not have the flexibility necessary for efficient shrimp farming that private industry possesses

The answer to which of the following questions would be most relevant to evaluating the adequacy of the explanation given above?

A. Who owns the 20 percent of estuaries that are not owned by the government?
B. What percentage of Ecuador’s production of shrimp is consumed domestically?
C. Has the government stated any plans to sell any of its estuaries to private industry, provided that the price is sufficient?
D. Is Peru, Ecuador’s neighbor to the south, actually better suited for commercial shrimp farming than Ecuador, which is a substantially smaller country?
E. How does Ecuador’s shrimp production on government-owned estuaries compare to that on comparable land owned by private industry?

Dear SajjadAhmad,

I'm happy to help. :-) This is a great CR practice question.

This question stem, "evaluating the adequacy of the explanation," is similar to evaluating the argument.

A. Who owns the 20 percent of estuaries that are not owned by the government?
Not helpful. Even if this 20% is devoted to maximum shrimp production, this is only a small part of what would be available. Furthermore, even if we know Company A vs. Company B owns these estuaries, how would we know which one would get more shrimp out of the situation.

B. What percentage of Ecuador’s production of shrimp is consumed domestically?
This changes the focus. The explanation is all about the production side. If Ecuador is producing a lot but consuming a lot, that's different problem. This is intriguing, but it would concern a different argument, not this one.

C. Has the government stated any plans to sell any of its estuaries to private industry, provided that the price is sufficient?
This would concern the future, perhaps the near future, but this argument is centered in the past & present.

D. Is Peru, Ecuador’s neighbor to the south, actually better suited for commercial shrimp farming than Ecuador, which is a substantially smaller country?
Suggestive, by analogy, but this is seldom the most persuasive kind of argument.

E. How does Ecuador’s shrimp production on government-owned estuaries compare to that on comparable land owned by private industry?
Bingo! The crux of the argument is that Ecuador does not produce much shrimp because the government owns most of the estuaries. Well, what happens on those estuaries owned by the government? How does the lack of "flexibility" really impact them? Is the shrimp production on government land really substantially less than on private land? The argument absolutely depends on this point.

OA = (E)

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Status: EAT SLEEP GMAT REPEAT!
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Posts: 170
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2018, 02:53
Hey abhimahna

Can you move this question to Argument Evaluation Category.

Thanks
_________________

Regards,
Adi

Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3622
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2018, 02:57
Adi93 wrote:
Hey abhimahna

Can you move this question to Argument Evaluation Category.

Thanks


Hey Adi93 ,

Done, thank you! :)
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Check our new About Us Page here.

GMAT Club Bot
Re: In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality, &nbs [#permalink] 18 Apr 2018, 02:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In theory, Ecuador could be a major exporter of shrimp. In actuality,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.