Nerdboy this is a very valid issue. INSEAD mints out over 800 grads per year. If they are placing 65% that is still 250 odd jobs (@400 for the December intake) - not bad going for Dec'08 when some serious hell broke loose. What will be interesting is to dig through these statistics further. For instance, how many placements were an immediate start (as opposed to deferred). How many of those placements are still valid after the crisis. Another interesting stat would be offers vs placements. Maybe students dont like those offers and are holding out for something better ? I don't know the real answers, I'm just speculating.
One of the factors that many people underestimate is the power of location and of proactive networking (as opposed to recruiter initiated networking in form of school events). Surely Fonty is at a disadvantage when it comes to proactively seeking out employers. In this scenario major center based schools such as Columbia / Stern or LBS are better placed. The other thing working against INSEAD is the two intakes model. Even though the class size for your intake might be 400 odd, the real class size is 800+ per year. That is a LOT of MBAs to compete for the same companies in the same YEAR ....
But despite all this, I feel that school choice should not be on fees but on the potential/experience. So, if you think that the cheaper MBA can provide the right kind of education and open the right kind of doors, you should pursue it anyway (regardless of the market conditions).
Any other thoughts on this ?