Author 
Message 
Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 47

Integrated Reasoning( MultiSource Reasoning) [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2012, 21:04



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128

Re: Integrated Reasoning( MultiSource Reasoning) [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jul 2012, 09:15
debabrata44 wrote: I'm happy to help with this. For the first one, the prompt says: Facebook is offering 180,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and selling stockholders are offering 241,233,615 shares of Class A common stock. Closing of the offering is expected to occur on May 22, 2012, subject to customary closing conditions. In addition, Facebook and the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a 30day option to purchase up to 63,185,042 additional shares of Class A common stock to cover overallotments, if any.So FB, the company itself, will sell 180,000,000 shares, and folks who already have FB shares (presumably investors and other insiders) will sell 241,233,615 shares. The question asks: The number of selling inside stockholders exceeds the number of new public investors on the day of the IPO.Well, here's what we do know  the number of shares sold by those selling inside stockholders (241,233,615) is less than the total number of shares offered for sale to new investors (180,000,000 + 241,233,615). More importantly, the question is not about the number of shares but about the number of actual people. Well, those 241,233,615 share sold by inside stockholders  how many people owned those? We don't know, but typically those are owned by big money investors  it may be that one individual could have plunked down some sizeable investment and wound up with, say 50,000,000 shares all by herself. There tend to be a small number of investors, each owning a gigantic number of shares. Now, thinking about the feeding frenzy when FB IPO'ed. Everyone's Aunt Jenny wanted to own a handful of shares. The number of new public investors was enormous, much much larger than the presumed number of big investors. Therefore, this statement is blatantly false. There's no way that there are more investors & insiders than general public investors, the great unwashed masses, all of whom want a piece of FB. Statement #1 is false. The second question ask: If the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) is defined as
[(ending value)/(beginning value)]^(1/n)  1
where n is number of years, then the CAGR between October 2007 and September 2009 is in excess of 100%.An intimidating looking question, but not actually too bad. We look at the second card "User Growth", and we see Ending Value (September 2009) = 300 Starting Value (October 2007) = 50 Yes, those numbers are really in millions, but for a percent change, we don't need to have all the extra zeros  we can just treat them as 300 and 50. The time period technically is 23 months, or 1 and 11/12 of a year, but for simplicity, I am going to approximate that as 2 years, n = 2. Plugging in, we get: CAGR = (300/50)^(1/2)  1 Well, that ratio inside parentheses  300/50 = 30/5 = 6, so we have CAGR = (300/50)^(1/2)  1 = (6)^(1/2)  1 Now, here, we could use the calculator, but I think it's much more efficient to approximate. When we take something to the 1/2 power, we are taking the squareroot of it. The square root of twelve  we don't need the exact value  since 4 < 6 < 9, we know 2 < sqrt(6) < 3  it's a number between 2 and 3. When we subtract one, we will get a number between 1 and 2 for the value of the CAGR. A CAGR = 1 would be 100% annual growth A CAGR = 2 would be 200% annual growth Here, we have a CAGR between 1 and 2, so it's more than 100% annual growth and less than 200% annual growth. So, now, we can answer the question  yes, absolutely, the CAGR between October 2007 and September 2009 is in excess of 100%. So, yes, the statement is true. Does all this make sense? Here's a video lesson you may find helpful: http://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/644int ... reasoningHere's an IR eBook you may find helpful: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmatinteg ... ingebook/Let me know if you have any further questions. Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Last edited by mikemcgarry on 07 Aug 2012, 11:04, edited 1 time in total.



Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 27

Re: Integrated Reasoning( MultiSource Reasoning) [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jul 2012, 08:21
Isn't the End of September 2009 value = 300? how did you get, Ending Value (September 2009) = 600? Using either 300 or 600 doesn't change the answer though. thanks a lot Jay mikemcgarry wrote: debabrata44 wrote: I'm happy to help with this. For the first one, the prompt says: Facebook is offering 180,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and selling stockholders are offering 241,233,615 shares of Class A common stock. Closing of the offering is expected to occur on May 22, 2012, subject to customary closing conditions. In addition, Facebook and the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a 30day option to purchase up to 63,185,042 additional shares of Class A common stock to cover overallotments, if any.So FB, the company itself, will sell 180,000,000 shares, and folks who already have FB shares (presumably investors and other insiders) will sell 241,233,615 shares. The question asks: The number of selling inside stockholders exceeds the number of new public investors on the day of the IPO.Well, here's what we do know  the number of shares sold by those selling inside stockholders (241,233,615) is less than the total number of shares offered for sale to new investors (180,000,000 + 241,233,615). More importantly, the question is not about the number of shares but about the number of actual people. Well, those 241,233,615 share sold by inside stockholders  how many people owned those? We don't know, but typically those are owned by big money investors  it may be that one individual could have plunked down some sizeable investment and wound up with, say 50,000,000 shares all by herself. There tend to be a small number of investors, each owning a gigantic number of shares. Now, thinking about the feeding frenzy when FB IPO'ed. Everyone's Aunt Jenny wanted to own a handful of shares. The number of new public investors was enormous, much much larger than the presumed number of big investors. Therefore, this statement is blatantly false. There's no way that there are more investors & insiders than general public investors, the great unwashed masses, all of whom want a piece of FB. Statement #1 is false. The second question ask: If the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) is defined as
[(ending value)/(beginning value)]^(1/n)  1
where n is number of years, then the CAGR between October 2007 and September 2009 is in excess of 100%.An intimidating looking question, but not actually too bad. We look at the second card "User Growth", and we see Ending Value (September 2009) = 600 Starting Value (October 2007) = 50 Yes, those numbers are really in millions, but for a percent change, we don't need to have all the extra zeros  we can just treat them as 600 and 50. The time period technically is 23 months, or 1 and 11/12 of a year, but for simplicity, I am going to approximate that as 2 years, n = 2. Plugging in, we get: CAGR = (600/50)^(1/2)  1 Well, that ratio inside parentheses  600/50 = 60/5 = 12, so we have CAGR = (600/50)^(1/2)  1 = (12)^(1/2)  1 Now, here, we could use the calculator, but I think it's much more efficient to approximate. When we take something to the 1/2 power, we are taking the squareroot of it. The square root of twelve  we don't need the exact value  since 9 < 12 < 16, we know 3 < sqrt(12) < 4  it's a number between 3 and 4. When we subtract one, we will get a number between 2 and 3 for the value of the CAGR. A CAGR = 1 would be 100% annual growth A CAGR = 2 would be 200% annual growth Here, we have a CAGR between 2 and 3, so it's more than 200% annual growth So, now, we can answer the question  yes, absolutely, the CAGR between October 2007 and September 2009 is very much in excess of 100% in fact it's even in excess of 200%. So, yes, the statement is true. Does all this make sense? Here's a video lesson you may find helpful: http://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/644int ... reasoningHere's an IR eBook you may find helpful: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmatinteg ... ingebook/Let me know if you have any further questions. Mike



Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 3

Re: Integrated Reasoning( MultiSource Reasoning) [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Aug 2012, 07:23
Great explanation! You really broke down the IR and made it simpler. Thanks so much .



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128

Re: Integrated Reasoning( MultiSource Reasoning) [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2012, 11:02
jayaddula wrote: Isn't the End of September 2009 value = 300? how did you get, Ending Value (September 2009) = 600? Using either 300 or 600 doesn't change the answer though. thanks a lot Jay Oops! Shuffling back and forth between this GC page and the GMAT Pill page where the problem was posted, apparently I misread or misremembered this number. Yes, absolutely, it should be 300, not 600. I'm going to correct it in my post. Thank you. Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep




Re: Integrated Reasoning( MultiSource Reasoning)
[#permalink]
07 Aug 2012, 11:02







