Interview

Question

Hi Folks,

I made it to the interview round and wanted to know your thoughts/advice on the options (on-campus interview or alumni interview). I am planning to go for the alumni interview as I have already completed the campus visit/tour and prefer to do the interview locally without travel (given work commitments).

Is it viewed negatively (i.e. commitment to the school, etc.) if I don't attend select the campus interview option?

Please share your advice/suggestions.

Thanks.

rhyme · Answer

Congrats. Generally there's no difference. The primary advantage of an on campus interview is that you can run into many students before hand and get advice, tips, ideas and material. Should you be waitlisted, you would have a far amount of stuff to talk about, but if you've already visited, you have most of this material/experience anyway. Given that, I'd probably just do an alumni interview.

pappu · Answer

Thanks Rhyme!

I will certainly impress upon the fact that I've serious interest in the school. Any tips/advice on how to demonstrate that commitment.

EconGirl · Answer

what school is in question? Generally alum interviewes tend to be less formal, more conversational and when i was in yoru shoes, I oten received advice to go with alum interviews if possible. 

In my personal experience student interviews have been the worst because students generally are not that good at interviewing, often are too rigid in following their list of questions, and I not great listeneres/ not good at picking up subtle messages (I was often asked a question that I felt I had already answered indirectly and a better listener would have picked up on) 

If you can get an interview with a memebr of adCom and you are good at interviewing, than take that over an alum; otherwise I'd probably go with an alum. Schools weigh equally alum and student interviews and if you already visited that school on a separate ocasion than you have nothing to worry about. 

so in my ever so limited experience:

AdCom = great interviews, they know what they are doing and can "fight" for you come decision time if you impress them

Alum = good interviews, not clear how important in the decision making

Student = weak interviews,not clear how important in the decision making

rhyme · Answer

Theres one other argument for student vs alumn though... student interviews are set at 30 or 40 minutes, alumni interviews can drag on much longer. If its not going well, an hour and a half an be brutal.

EconGirl · Answer

very true. my one alum interview was 2+ hours but it went very well. I thought that was rare though

3underscore · Answer

On the other hand, alumni interviews can be stunningly brief!

rhyme · Answer

True True.

GMATT73 · Answer

I had a 90 minute interview with the Dean of Admissions and thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it. Just make sure that you strike the right chord with your interviewer and ask insightful questions.

lepium · Answer

I interviewed with an alumn who had not interviewed that many applicants since his graduation (maybe 1 other interview in 5 years). After going through the standard questions, I asked him a typical question on the particular program and this triggered about a half hour of pleasant chat on all the things he did during the program and how much he had enjoyed it. I think that going back to these happy memories left him with a much better feeling about me and my commitment to the school and my potential fit. On the other hand, there are no feelings with adcoms. 

Cheers. L.

Interview

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards