Even using both Statements, looking at where the two inequalities overlap, we only know that 0 < x < 3. So it's possible that x = 1, in which case -1 < x < 2 is true and the answer is 'yes', but it is possible that x = 2.5, in which case -1 < x < 2 is false and the answer is 'no'. So we don't have sufficient information to answer the question, and the answer is E.
_________________

IanStewart

I know this question should be super easy but please explain when I went wrong.

Target question: Possible values of x: 0<=x<=1

Statement 1: 1<=x<=3
0 is not part of this; hence false

Statement 2: -1<=x<=2
Both 0 and 1 are part of this range, hence B should be the answer.

Please, correct me if I am wrong.

I think there are two things wrong with your approach. First, I believe you're assuming x is an integer, and in pure algebra questions, you should never assume (unless told) that your unknowns are integers. It's possible, using Statement 1, that x = 2.5, for example.

But it also appears that you're approaching the question 'backwards', if I understand correctly how you solved. It seems to me you assumed x was either 0 or 1, and then tested whether each Statement was true. That's doing things the wrong way around. In DS, the Statements are facts. They cannot be wrong, so you never want to test whether a Statement is true -- the Statements are automatically true. It's the question itself that we don't know the answer to. So here, we aren't sure, before using the Statements, if x is between -1 and 2. When we look at Statement 2 alone, we know for an absolute fact that x is between -2 and 3, but that's all we know. So it's possible that x = 1, say, and then the answer to the question "Is -1 < x < 2?" is "yes". But it's also possible that x = 2.5, or x = -1.5, and then the answer to the question "Is -1 < x < 2?" is "no". Since we can get two different answers to the question, "yes" and "no", Statement 2 is not sufficient alone. And as in my post above, even using both Statements we can't be certain x is between -1 and 2, so the answer is E.
_________________

We need the range to be within -1 < x < 2 for sufficiency.

Statement 1:
We can select x = 1 or x = 3.5, x = 1 would be within (-1, 2) but x = 3.5 would be outside. Insufficient.

Statement 2:
We can select x = 1 or x = -1.5, x = 1 would be within (-1, 2) but x = -1.5 would be outside. Insufficient.

Combined:
Combined we can reduce the range to 0 < x < 3. However, this does not fully incorporate -1 < x < 2 so this is insufficient. E.g. x = 2.5 is outside of range.

Ans: E
_________________

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________