Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

(1) \(2x-3y=-2\) --> question becomes: is \(-2<x^2\)? as square of a number is always non-negative (\(x^2\geq{0}\)) then \(x^2\geq{0}>-2\). Sufficient.

(2) \(x>2\) and \(y>0\) --> is \(2x-3y<x^2\) --> is \(x(x-2)+3y>0\) --> as \(x>2\) then \(x(x-2)\) is a positive number and as \(y>0\) then \(3y\) is also a positive number --> sum of two positive numbers is more than zero, hence \(x(x-2)+3y>0\) is true. Sufficient.

1. you should see you can replace the terms of 2x-3y so you get -2<x^2 ? since any number squared is positive this is SUFF 2. You can view this problem in another way: 2x will always be less than x^2 as x >2. And since y >0 that means the left side 2x-3y will be even fewer than 2x so left side will always be less than x^2 SUFF (brunnel's answer is another approach so i chose this way from another pespective)
_________________

1. you should see you can replace the terms of 2x-3y so you get -2<x^2 ? since any number squared is positive this is SUFF 2. You can view this problem in another way: 2x will always be less than x^2 as x >2. And since y >0 that means the left side 2x-3y will be even fewer than 2x so left side will always be less than x^2 SUFF (brunnel's answer is another approach so i chose this way from another pespective)

Thanks shaselai, much easier to follow.
_________________

1. you should see you can replace the terms of 2x-3y so you get -2<x^2 ? since any number squared is positive this is SUFF 2. You can view this problem in another way: 2x will always be less than x^2 as x >2. And since y >0 that means the left side 2x-3y will be even fewer than 2x so left side will always be less than x^2 SUFF (brunnel's answer is another approach so i chose this way from another pespective)

Thanks shaselai, much easier to follow.

Just a little correction, which makes no difference for this particular question but is very important, as GMAT likes to catch on differences like this: square of a number is non-negative (and not positive) --> \(x^2\geq{0}\), because if \(x=0\) then \(x^2=0\).

In heat of solving question, I missed to notice that statement 1 is same as inquality question. I concluded with D but after spending time
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

Your explaination for why second statement alone is sufficient to answer the question proves that x(x-2)+3y > o. But this does not answer whether ( 2x-3y < x^2)

Your explaination for why second statement alone is sufficient to answer the question proves that x(x-2)+3y > o. But this does not answer whether ( 2x-3y < x^2)

Can you please explain.

Thanks

Question: "is \(2x-3y<x^2\)?" --> rearrange --> "is \(2x-x^2-3y<0\)" --> and finally the question becomes "is \(x(x-2)+3y>0\)?". So \(2x-3y<x^2\) and \(x(x-2)+3y>0\) are the same, if you prove that \(x(x-2)+3y>0\) is true then you know that \(2x-3y<x^2\) is also true.

Re: Is 2x - 3y < x^2 ? (1) 2x - 3y = -2 (2) x > 2 and y [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Apr 2013, 10:04

Dear Bunuel Need some clarification on this question, as i am getting A as an answer What i did: 2x - 3y < X^2 - since x^2 will be positive number i divided both sides by X^2 - the equation provided became (2x-3y)/x^2<0. later when i plugged in various numbers to test the validity they gave me both a Yes and a No answer. Where am i going wrong. Can you please correct me?

(2) \(x>2\) and \(y>0\) --> is \(2x-3y<x^2\) --> is \(x(x-2)+3y>0\) --> as \(x>2\) then \(x(x-2)\) is a positive number and as \(y>0\) then \(3y\) is also a positive number --> sum of two positive numbers is more than zero, hence \(x(x-2)+3y>0\) is true. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Great Manipulation for Statement 2!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

In this DS question, you might find that 'rewriting' the question makes it easier to answer. Either way, you'll find that a combination of logic, Number Properties and TESTing VALUES will come in handy.

We're asked if 2X - 3Y < X^2. You can 'rewrite' the question to ask if 2X < X^2 + 3Y. Either way, this is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: 2X - 3Y = -2

Here, the 'original' version of the question is probably easier to answer, since we now have a value that we can 'substitute' in for (2X - 3Y)....

The question now asks.....

Is -2 < X^2?

X^2 can be 0 or any positive value, so with ALL possible values of X, the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES. Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

Fact 2: X > 2 and Y > 0

With this Fact, the 'rewritten' version of the question is probably easier to answer.

Since we know that X > 2......2X will ALWAYS be < X^2.

We also know that Y > 0, so (X^2 + 3Y) will get larger as Y gets larger. This all serves as evidence that....

2X is ALWAYS < X^2 + 3Y. The answer to the question is ALWAYS YES. Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 1) 2x-3y =-2 => 3y =2x+2 The question -> 2x-3y<x^2 => 2x-x^2<3y Comparing these e equations we get that 3y> 2x-x^2 (x^2 is always positive and hence the value of 2x-x^2 will always be less than 2x+2 Sufficient

Statement 2) x>2, y>0 Consider, x=4 and y = 2, substituting the values of x and y in 2x-3y<x^2, we get -> 2<16; or x=3 and y=4 we get 2*3-3*4<3^2 => 6-12<9 or -6<9 In all the cases we get 2x-3y<x^2

Sufficient.

Answer D

Please suggest if this approach is correct. Thanks a lot

Statement1: if 2x - 3y = -2 , then 2x - 3y will always be less than x^2 because x^2 has to be a positive number. Sufficient to answer the question

Statement2: 2x=x^2 when x equals 2. This means that 2x is always less than x^2 if x is greater than 2. 3y is not a concern because we are subtracting that quantity from 2x. 3y would only be a concern if y is less than zero and the "-3y" becomes a positive term. However, statement 2 lists that y>0. This means that the term "-3y" will always be negative, and for possible combinations of x and y, 2x-3y will always be greater than x^2. Sufficient to answer the question.

Both statements are sufficient, the answer should be D.
_________________