Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:14 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,264
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,264
 [7]
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
satya2029
Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2025
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Posts: 231
Kudos: 249
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
avirup2018
Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
avirup2018
Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
satya2029
Bunuel
Is \(\frac{m}{n^2+1} > \frac{n}{m^2+2}\)?

(1) \(m = n\)
(2) \(n < 0\)

Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions
From 1
m=n=0
0>0 NO
m=n=1
1/2>1/3 YES
From 2
m=n=-1
-1/2>-1/3 NO
m=5 n =-1/2
5/2>-1/27 YES
m=n=-1/2
1/5>1/9 YES
FROM 1 AND 2
m=n=-1 NO
m=n=-1/2 YES
E:)


Not satisfactory for B if we use N<0 then one part simply becomes negative....no point in assuming m

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
satya2029
Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2025
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Posts: 231
Kudos: 249
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avirup2018
Why are u assuming m when nothing is said about m only thing is said is about n<0....

Posted from my mobile device

Just to observe each and every case. In this way you actually test statement 1 within statement 2.
User avatar
aalalal
Joined: 17 Apr 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Location: Azerbaijan
Posts: 20
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think together it makes sense, say n=-1=m, then always, first half < second half. Sufficient to answer the questions.
avatar
shiva1325
Joined: 30 Nov 2019
Last visit: 28 Nov 2021
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 17
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
first consider statement 1 alone:
given m=n
if we substitute we get
m/(m^2+1)>m/(m^2+2)
we can observe that denominator of LHS is lesser than denominator of RHS
but we dont know whether m>0 or m<0
so there is no unique answer.

Now consider statement 2 alone:
given n<0
here we do not have definite relationship between m,n
and also we no nothing about m
hence no unique answer.

Now consider both statements together:
m=n and n<0 implies m<0
substituting we get
m/(m^2+1)>m/(m^2+2)
since we know that m<0
we get unique answer

hence answer is C
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
496 posts