GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 06 Dec 2019, 00:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 57
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 06-11-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE: Marketing (Consumer Products)
GMAT ToolKit User
Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 Apr 2019, 22:47
1
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (01:54) correct 55% (02:25) wrong based on 176 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Originally posted by shivanigs on 11 Aug 2012, 22:48.
Last edited by Bunuel on 04 Apr 2019, 22:47, edited 4 times in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2012, 01:21
5
1
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
General Discussion
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 584
WE: Science (Education)
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2012, 01:44
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.



Visualizing the situation for Statement (2):
We are given that the distance between \(s\) and \(r\) is greater than the distance between \(s\) and \(t.\)

\(r_1---t_1--s--t_2---r_2\)

Now we can see that \(r\) is definitely not between \(s\) and \(t\).
Sufficient.

Answer B
_________________
PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 58
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2012, 04:04
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|


The solution already mentioned is a very novel one, it uses the basic definition of Modulus
|a| = distance of point a from Origin that is (0) or (0,0) or (0,0,0) where a can be anything rational, irrational, real or even imaginary.
and some times we spend lots of time in solving the questions algebraically, simplifying the expressions when they can be very easily done if we spend a lil more time understanding the question.
IN Most of the problems in algebra we can narrow down to the range of answer if we define the range and domain of all the functions involved in that expression.

In this example if you are not able to remember what the modulus of a number means you can always use the basic rule that
|a| < |b| implies ....... -|b| < a<|b|

apply it to both the options.
Director
Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 945
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 01:47
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

small query
I am used to the general perception that if there is Mod on both sides of the equation then we have 2 cases

1) Both the sides of the equation have the same sign or 2) Both the sides have opposite signs

using the same logic here for statement 2 --> |r -s | > |s - t|.
I thought we could write this as r-s >s-t -->r+t>2s case 1

or

r-s>-s+t --> case 2 ( both the sides opposite signs ) which gives r>t
so if r>t then statement 2 is also satisfied , but here we have nothing about s
so I thought if r>t then statement 2 is also insufficient , as there is nothing about s. what is the flaw here?

why cannot we have r-s>-s+t and hence r>t for statement 2 ?
Thank you
_________________
- Stne
Director
Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 945
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2013, 02:29
can any body help with this query of mine, thank you
_________________
- Stne
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2013, 02:47
stne wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

small query
I am used to the general perception that if there is Mod on both sides of the equation then we have 2 cases

1) Both the sides of the equation have the same sign or 2) Both the sides have opposite signs

using the same logic here for statement 2 --> |r -s | > |s - t|.
I thought we could write this as r-s >s-t -->r+t>2s case 1

or

r-s>-s+t --> case 2 ( both the sides opposite signs ) which gives r>t
so if r>t then statement 2 is also satisfied , but here we have nothing about s
so I thought if r>t then statement 2 is also insufficient , as there is nothing about s. what is the flaw here?

why cannot we have r-s>-s+t and hence r>t for statement 2 ?
Thank you


Not a good way to solve this problem.

What is the question you are trying to answer there?
When you say that r-s and s-t have the same/opposite signs, what cases you'd have?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2014, 00:04
1
1 ) In the number line,is R between S and T ?
a.) |r-s|<|r-t|
b.)|r-s|>|s-t|
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2014, 00:09
1
Ravithj wrote:
1 ) In the number line,is R between S and T ?
a.) |r-s|<|r-t|
b.)|r-s|>|s-t|


Merging similar topics. Please refer to the discussion above.

Also, please read carefully and follow: rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html Pay attention to rules 3 and 7. Thank you.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 356
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Aug 2017, 12:26
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|


Great Question on the core definition of absolute values.
s---r---t or t----r----s ?

1) |r-s| < |r-t|
Distance b/w r & s is less than the distance b/w r & t.
r--s-------t -> No
s-r------t -> Yes
Insufficient.

2) |r-s| > |s-t|
Distance between r & s is greater than the distance b/w s & t
=> r cannot be between s & t.
Sufficient.

B is the answer.
_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2017, 08:31
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.


There can be no easier explanation than this. Thanks!
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2019, 22:50
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|


Similar questions:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-s-between ... 92599.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-s-between ... 92600.html
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
V
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5428
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2019, 04:06
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|


#1
we get |r -s| < |r - t|
t>s
s+t>2r
relation btwn r & t not know

so r....s......t or s...t....r

insufficient
#2
|r -s| > |s - t|
2s>t+r
r>t
so we can say that
t....r....s ; sufficient
IMO B
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|   [#permalink] 06 Apr 2019, 04:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne