Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
17 Dec 2023, 09:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
What if an argument has a conclusion that is always true. Would such an argument be valid? According to strict definitions when the premise is true, the conclusion is true even though the premise plays no role in supporting or making the conclusion true.
For eg - Some odd numbers are not primes, so some primes are not odd numbers. (here both the premise and conclusion are true always, but the argument holds not because of the reasoning.
Another eg: Some biologists are not researchers, so some researchers are not biologists. (premise, conclusion true, but reasoning is flawed.)
For eg - Some odd numbers are not primes, so some primes are not odd numbers. (here both the premise and conclusion are true always, but the argument holds not because of the reasoning.
Another eg: Some biologists are not researchers, so some researchers are not biologists. (premise, conclusion true, but reasoning is flawed.)
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
