Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 00:21 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 00:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 540
Own Kudos:
438
 [2]
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 540
Kudos: 438
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 540
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 540
Kudos: 438
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,734
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dave13
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 15 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,086
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,086
Kudos: 1,138
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
warrior1991


I was reading the New York Times article .

Is the below sentence correct. I think there is a modifier issue.

Please help.



Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

warrior1991

Yes, there is definitely a modifier issue. Good catch!

Scientists were not buried beneath a half mile of ice and snow in Greenland.

:lol: :lol:


.... and most SC sentences are copied from NYtimes or similar media and used in official guides and subsequently in gmat exams ....
User avatar
soapbolt
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2019
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 245
Location: India
Posts: 58
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good Catch mate :)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,132
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,819
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ha! Great catch, warrior1991. If this appeared on the GMAT, it would absolutely be wrong, because it literally says that scientists are buried beneath half a mile of snow and ice in Greenland. And that would suck for the scientists.

Here's the thing: the GMAT tests a whole bunch of random things that nobody actually cares about in real life. If you read some of the world's best-written publications, you'll see all sorts of things that would be wrong on the GMAT. I'm a big fan of The Economist (or at least I used to be, back when I had time to read), and in every Economist article, you'll see a pile of phrases that would be wrong on the GMAT. Here are a bunch of examples.

Frankly, I side with The Economist in real life. I would also side with the New York Times for the most part. If New York Times editors don't care about the modifier error, I'm not sure that we should, either. But the GMAT still does, for whatever reason. So we're stuck with it.

And while I'm ripping on GMAT SC: a ton of the CORRECT answers are incredibly crappy sentences. I used to manage a fairly large team of writers, and there's no way that I would have hired anybody who writes like the GMAT does. The GMAT is stuck in some ridiculous 1930s definition of "correct" English, and I don't really understand why.

In short: don't let reality get in the way of your GMAT! SC operates under its own quirky rules, and those rules don't always have anything to do with good, well-written, modern English.