Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
To get rid of the x as denomintor, I was thinking of multyiplying the numerator with (x)(x+16) but it seems convulted and long for a gmat problem...any shortcuts..
Thanks!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
To get rid of the x as denomintor, I was thinking of multyiplying the numerator with (x)(x+16) but it seems convulted and long for a gmat problem...any shortcuts..
Thanks!
Show more
Hi!
Do you have answer choices? Almost certainly the quickest way to get the right answer is to backsolve.
You could also work it out intiutively - we know that 480/x is 5 more than 480/(x+16). So, what factor pairs of 480 have one number that's 5 apart and another that's 16 apart?
To get rid of the x as denomintor, I was thinking of multyiplying the numerator with (x)(x+16) but it seems convulted and long for a gmat problem...any shortcuts..
To get rid of the x as denomintor, I was thinking of multyiplying the numerator with (x)(x+16) but it seems convulted and long for a gmat problem...any shortcuts..
If there are no options to help out at this stage, consider that numbers in GMAT problems almost always fall beautifully in place. I will first try x = 16 because I know 16*6 = 96 I get \(\frac{96}{16} = \frac{96}{{16+16}} + 1\) 6=4 (x is not 16) Since I need to reduce the left hand side, I will try a bigger value of x, 24 because 96/24 = 4 but 24+16 = 40 which doesn't divide 96 completely. Next number I will try will be 32 since 96/32 = 3. Also 96/(32 + 16) = 2. This satisfies the equation.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.