GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 08:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Is there always a need to identify the assumption, and then

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Is there always a need to identify the assumption, and then  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2008, 07:53
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Is there always a need to identify the assumption, and then strengthening it?

Or do we just focus on the conclusion and find something that directly strengthens the conclusion.

From MGMAT:
1. Fix a potential weakness of the conclusion OR
2. introduce additional supporting evidence.


For example, when doing weakening questions, it's critical to find the assumption and attack it.

I'm wondering if the same applies to strengthening questions, but we support it instead of attack it.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2008, 10:37
1
Q1: No, I don't think you will always be able to find an assumption in an argument. There are too many possibilities. For example, I can say that I will get a burger from Inn-n-out today. There are many assumptions one can make (i.e. I have transportation to get there, Inn-n-out will still sell have burgers, I won't get hit by an asteroid, etc...).

Q2: Yes, for strengthen questions you would do the opposite and find information to support the argument.

Here is the approach I would take for strengthen/weaken questions:

ID conclusion and its supporting evidence
(1) ID the author's assumptions (if any). If present, prephrase something to prevent you from choosing a wrong answer choice.
AND/OR
(2) Add additional information to make the argument stronger/weaker.

Also, for strengthen/weaken questions the stronger claim is usually correct. You do not need to totally destroy an argument but merely strengthen/weaken it by 0.0000001%.

Consider the claim from Bobby, "eating lots of Halloween candy can cause cavities".

(a) Some people who eat lots of Halloween candy do not develop cavities. (this statement is still consistent with the claim that eating lots of candy can cause cavities) Eliminate - this claim does nothing to the argument.

(b) All people who eat lots of Halloween candy will eventually develop cavities. (This statement is right because it doesn't leave any gaping holes in the argument. When one eats candy, they will develop cavities)

HTH
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1004
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2008, 10:47
somerandomguy wrote:
Q1: No, I don't think you will always be able to find an assumption in an argument. There are too many possibilities. For example, I can say that I will get a burger from Inn-n-out today. There are many assumptions one can make (i.e. I have transportation to get there, Inn-n-out will still sell have burgers, I won't get hit by an asteroid, etc...).

Q2: Yes, for strengthen questions you would do the opposite and find information to support the argument.

Here is the approach I would take for strengthen/weaken questions:

ID conclusion and its supporting evidence
(1) ID the author's assumptions (if any). If present, prephrase something to prevent you from choosing a wrong answer choice.
AND/OR
(2) Add additional information to make the argument stronger/weaker.

Also, for strengthen/weaken questions the stronger claim is usually correct. You do not need to totally destroy an argument but merely strengthen/weaken it by 0.0000001%.

Consider the claim from Bobby, "eating lots of Halloween candy can cause cavities".

(a) Some people who eat lots of Halloween candy do not develop cavities. (this statement is still consistent with the claim that eating lots of candy can cause cavities) Eliminate - this claim does nothing to the argument.

(b) All people who eat lots of Halloween candy will eventually develop cavities. (This statement is right because it doesn't leave any gaping holes in the argument. When one eats candy, they will develop cavities)

HTH


Thanks :) :P some random guy comes out of nowhere and helps :lol:

+1 for you
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2008, 10:59
That's a good post. I think that's where I've been beating myself up too much.

When I read the premise, i ALWAYS try to find the assumption, and I think this gets me in trouble because I over assume.

Do you guys read the question before jumping into the passage?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2008, 11:05
bigfernhead wrote:
That's a good post. I think that's where I've been beating myself up too much.

When I read the premise, i ALWAYS try to find the assumption, and I think this gets me in trouble because I over assume.

Do you guys read the question before jumping into the passage?


It's relative. For myself, I've been instructed to read the question first. However, others think that reading the stimulus first allows them to be more critical of the information. To each, his own! :)

Edited: For randomness....
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3414
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2008, 15:56
I thought you may find some useful tips in these threads.

Useful Tips for CR
> http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=14833

If X then Y, help for CR
> http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=14547

CR- Bank Executives
> http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=13782

Logical Fallacies - help on CR and AWA
> http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=40345
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2008, 08:40
Awesome! Thanks!

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: What's the best strategy for strengthening CR questions? &nbs [#permalink] 03 Nov 2008, 08:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is there always a need to identify the assumption, and then

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.