Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
As I was studying for the GMAT a doubt on parallelism downed on me. I'll exemplify it through an example that should make it clearer in case anyone more expert than me would like to jump in:
- John contributed to archeology through new discoveries and by documenting old ones.
"Through" and "by" are both prepositions, but in this case the first one is followed by a noun while the second one is followed by a verb in the 'ing' form. Consequently I'm not sure whether this sentence could still be considered parallel or not.
Anyone knows whether this sentence would be considered right or wrong on the GMAT?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
- John contributed to archeology through new discoveries and by documenting old ones.
"Through" and "by" are both prepositions, but in this case the first one is followed by a noun while the second one is followed by a verb in the 'ing' form. Consequently I'm not sure whether this sentence could still be considered parallel or not.
Anyone knows whether this sentence would be considered right or wrong on the GMAT?
Show more
The sentence is not properly parallel and would almost certainly be wrong.
The following is fine: John contributed to archeology by making new discoveries and by documenting old ones. There must be many other ways of making the sentence parallel.
But in the GMAT we do not judge right/wrong in isolation. We compare with the other answers.
Yes I understand your point on the answer comparison, vv65.
I did not post any answer choice because my main purpose was to understand whether the sentence reported is parallel and whether it therefore contains a definitive error, regardless of the other answer choices.
From what you said, I understand that for a sentence to be parallel I cannot rely just on the prepositions that start correctly the two 'legs', but I also have to rely on what follows right after, e.g. verb, noun, or modifier. Correct?
From what you said, I understand that for a sentence to be parallel I cannot rely just on the prepositions that start correctly the two 'legs', but I also have to rely on what follows right after, e.g. verb, noun, or modifier. Correct?
Show more
Yes, something like that. You have to also rely on the nature of the two legs. In your sentence the second leg is an action (a gerund?), the first isn't (it's a noun).
Just remember, I did not say that your sentence is definitely wrong! Just that it's most unlikely to be right.
Just remember, I did not say that your sentence is definitely wrong! Just that it's most unlikely to be right.
Show more
Alright, so we could synthesize your answer with: "The aforementioned parallelism is likely wrong, but not definitively". Thanks.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.