Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
So, I just came across an absolute value equation that I had to solve:
12 + | w - 4 | = 30
I managed to solve for both the positive and negative values successfully:
Positive value:
w - 4 = 30 - 12 w - 4 = 18 w = 22
Negative value:
w - 4 = - 18 w = 14
Now, plugging in the values to get confirmation:
12 + | 22 - 4 | 12 + 18 = 30
So positive value 18 is correct.
Then for the second value:
12 + | - 14 - 4 | 12 + ( - 18 ) = - 6, and since - 6 ≠ 30, the negative value - 14 is incorrect.
However, according to the explanation given in the book, the solution - 14 is valid because:
12 + | - 14 - 4 |= 12 + 18 = 30, but the result should be 12 - 18, not 12 + 18.
Is there something I am missing here or is it just a mistake on the book?
Show more
avigutman Quick question, for solving absolute value equations, is it always recommended to isolate the part of the equation that has absolute value bars on one side before creating your + and - case?
I see that Manhattan Prep first simplifies to solve, but doing out the math: Case 1: 12-w+4=30 --> w=-14 Case 2: 12+w-4=3- --> w=22 There seems to be no difference.
For solving absolute value equations, is it always recommended to isolate the part of the equation that has absolute value bars on one side before creating your + and - case?
Show more
woohoo921 If you're using textbook algebra (which I don't recommend), isolating the absolute value expression first is probably going to reduce your chances of making a careless error, but it's not necessary. I recommend using reasoning, and for that you'll definitely want to isolate the absolute value expression. The reasoning approach utilizes the fact that the absolute value describes the expression's distance from zero, without making any commitment regarding which side of zero the expression is on. In this case, I'd say that (w-4) lies 18 units away from zero on the number line, and w is going to be exactly 4 units to the right of (w-4). So w is either -14 or 22. Once you've practiced this a bunch, it becomes so easy to visualize it in your head that you don't even need pen/paper anymore!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.