It is not correct that the people of the United States, relative to comparable countries, are the most lightly taxed. True, the United States has the lowest tax, as percent of gross domestic product, of the Western industrialized countries, but tax rates alone do not tell the whole story. People in the United States pay out of pocket for many goods and services provided from tax revenues elsewhere. Consider universal health care, which is an entitlement supported by tax revenues in every other Western industrialized country. United States government health-care expenditures are equivalent to about 5 percent of the gross domestic product, but private health-care expenditures represent another 7 percent. This 7 percent, then, amounts to a tax.
C: It is not correct that the people of the United States, relative to comparable countries, are the most lightly taxed
P: Literally everything else: Because the US pays for other services that don't count, but count for other countries, therefore the critics are wrong.
WRONG. It still isn't a tax being applied, which is the error we are looking for. The argument concerning whether the people of the United States are the most lightly taxed is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms?
(A) It bases a comparison on percentages rather than on absolute numbers --
Nope, we are dealing with percentages so this is wrong. (B) It unreasonably extends the application of a key term --
Perfect! It is saying that a key term, in this case tax, is being applied in another way (Because we don't count something that others do, therefore we are going to count it). But this isn't a tax because that is not how taxes work and that is not how definitions work. This is absolutely the answer. (C) It uses negatively charged language instead of attempting to give a reason --
Nothing in here is negative but even if it was negative, would that be a flaw in an argument? Would that be enough to tip the scales? Probably not. So I can't see this being right in any instance.
(D)
It generalizes from only a few instances -- We are comparing the US vs other countries, so this isn't committing a "too few" or "biased" response. (E) It sets up a dichotomy between alternatives that are not exclusive --
This is an either/or error. But the argument isn't saying that you cannot have one if you have the other so this is wrong. An example of this would be: If Jack goes to the party, then Meghan doesn't go. The logic: J --> M OR M --> J _________________
My CR Guide: Here My RC Guide: Here My Legendary Debrief: Here Daagh's AWA Responses. Go: Here Want to know your Business School chances? Go: HereWant to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here