Last visit was: 14 Jul 2025, 18:21 It is currently 14 Jul 2025, 18:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gnpth
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Last visit: 03 Mar 2023
Posts: 1,049
Own Kudos:
6,616
 [36]
Given Kudos: 330
Status:Chasing my MBB Dream!
Location: United States (DC)
WE:General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Posts: 1,049
Kudos: 6,616
 [36]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,009
Own Kudos:
2,950
 [8]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,009
Kudos: 2,950
 [8]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 14 Jul 2025
Posts: 11,294
Own Kudos:
41,743
 [6]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 11,294
Kudos: 41,743
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 14 Jul 2025
Posts: 4,725
Own Kudos:
36,170
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4,813
Posts: 4,725
Kudos: 36,170
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please: whenever post a question be really careful.

A CR without the stem is like a car without the steering wheel.

Thank you for your collaboration
User avatar
PiyushK
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Last visit: 19 May 2023
Posts: 599
Own Kudos:
4,876
 [3]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 599
Kudos: 4,876
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gnpth
It is proposed to introduce mosquitoes into the wild with genetic alterations that destroy their disease-carrying capacity. In this way, the dangerous wild population could eventually be replaced with a harmless one without leaving room for another disease-transmitting type to flourish. One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates; another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which of the following identifies a discrepancy in the proposal above?

A.It is presupposed that the three genes would prove equally easy to isolate and insert into the cells of the mosquitoes.

B.Two of the ways of destroying disease carrying capacity in the wild would jeopardize the goal of the proposal.

C.It does not take into account positive roles that mosquitoes play in the environment, such as serving, in the larval stage, as food for fish.

D. None of the proposed alternatives would ensure that there would be fewer mosquitoes in any given area.

E. Evidence is not presented to show that each alternative method has been successfully tested on a wide scale.

B it is.

Last 2 genes are conflicting.
another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.
User avatar
nirav2610
Joined: 16 Feb 2015
Last visit: 20 Dec 2021
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Oman
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 550 Q44 V19
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.21
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
Posts: 3
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"Two of the ways ..."(not mating & dying) Does this mean the 2nd gene would not jeopardize the goal of the proposal?
User avatar
sun01
Joined: 15 May 2010
Last visit: 28 Jul 2018
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
Posts: 101
Kudos: 70
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease."

These two ways are contradicting each other.

So, it should be B.
User avatar
hwgmat2015
Joined: 12 Mar 2015
Last visit: 24 Jul 2020
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Concentration: Leadership, Finance
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 59
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nevernevergiveup
It is proposed to introduce mosquitoes into the wild with genetic alterations that destroy their disease-carrying capacity. In this way, the dangerous wild population could eventually be replaced with a harmless one without leaving room for another disease-transmitting type to flourish. One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates; another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which of the following identifies a discrepancy in the proposal above?

A. It is presupposed that the three genes would prove equally easy to isolate and insert into the cells of the mosquitoes.
B. Two of the ways of destroying disease carrying capacity in the wild would jeopardize the goal of the proposal.
C. It does not take into account positive roles that mosquitoes play in the environment, such as serving, in the larval stage, as food for fish.
D. None of the proposed alternatives would ensure that there would be fewer mosquitoes in any given area.
E. Evidence is not presented to show that each alternative method has been successfully tested on a wide scale.


Objective here is to replace harmful mosquitoes will harmless ones.

option A - Out of Scope
Option B- Yes. The two options contradict the main objective.
Option C- Out of Scope
Option D- Fewer mosquitoes . Not relevant with the objective.
Option E- Out of Scope.

Answer: B
User avatar
PrakharGMAT
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 May 2017
Posts: 153
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 153
Kudos: 709
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts / chetan2u ,

I am not able to understand this argument. Can you please help.

PiyushK,
Can you please suggest how Last 2 genes are conflicting...?

In-fact I think the last 2 genes are similar, Second gene is causing destruction in disease parasite so that the disease can't be transferred and other is killing the mosquito so that the disease can't be transferred.

Actually, I am not able to comprehend this argument what it is trying to say.

Please assist.
Thanks and Regards,
Prakhar
User avatar
arirux92
Joined: 03 May 2015
Last visit: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
240
 [3]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE:Web Development (Insurance)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PrakharGMAT
Hi Experts / chetan2u ,

I am not able to understand this argument. Can you please help.

PiyushK,
Can you please suggest how Last 2 genes are conflicting...?

In-fact I think the last 2 genes are similar, Second gene is causing destruction in disease parasite so that the disease can't be transferred and other is killing the mosquito so that the disease can't be transferred.

Actually, I am not able to comprehend this argument what it is trying to say.

Please assist.
Thanks and Regards,
Prakhar



Hi Prakhar,

the question is basically this : creating a breed of mosquito with the following characteristics :

1) One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates
2) Another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted
3) another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

So the assumption is that that particular breed of mosquito will breed with mosquitoes in the wild and produce offsprings with those characteristics and so on... resulting in reducing the parasite which kills the diseases.

But if you look closely at 1 and 3

1)One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates

This means the mosquito will not be able to breed. Destroying the assumption

3) another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which means the mosquito is highly vulnerable to that disease. So as soon as it goes into the wild, it dies and shall no longer be able to breed or fulfill the assumption in the first place

These two points cancel assumption

As for 2) It's saying it will destroy the parasite before it is transmitted; not the mosquito. While 3 says that the mosquito will die. They are not the same at all 2 is killing the disease, 3 is killing the messenger
User avatar
PrakharGMAT
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 May 2017
Posts: 153
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 153
Kudos: 709
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Folks / chetan2u,

Thanks for your contribution and helping me to understand the argument.
I just want to reiterate the situation so that you can confirm I understood it correctly-

The are 2 entities-
1. Parasite
2. Mosquito
3. Human

Parasite enters in the mosquito to find mate
Mosquito gets the disease.
So, when Mosquito attack to human, Human gets the disease.

Talking about last 2 genes-

-->another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted;
This says, the gene will destruct PARASITE before it could transmit to MOSQUITO.

-->another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.
This says, the gene will destruct MOSQUITO's resistance to PARASITE before it could transmit disease to HUMAN.

Am I thinking in right direction..??

Thanks and Regards,,
Prakahr
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 14 Jul 2025
Posts: 11,294
Own Kudos:
41,743
 [1]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 11,294
Kudos: 41,743
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PrakharGMAT
Hi Folks / chetan2u,

Thanks for your contribution and helping me to understand the argument.
I just want to reiterate the situation so that you can confirm I understood it correctly-

The are 2 entities-
1. Parasite
2. Mosquito
3. Human

Parasite enters in the mosquito to find mate
Mosquito gets the disease.
So, when Mosquito attack to human, Human gets the disease.

Talking about last 2 genes-

-->another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted;
This says, the gene will destruct PARASITE before it could transmit to MOSQUITO.

-->another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.
This says, the gene will destruct MOSQUITO's resistance to PARASITE before it could transmit disease to HUMAN.

Am I thinking in right direction..??

Thanks and Regards,,
Prakahr

Hi,
the beginning of whole thing could be--
1) The wild mosquitos are susceptible to these parasite, which cause disease. So, they get this parasite from some other diseased person or animal when they bite that person or animal, and they just become carrier/transmitter of it. The moment they bite some healthy person, they transmit the disease to him/her but in the process they do not get affected because of immunity in their body against these parasite.
2) Now what is the role of these genes..
a) 1st will make changes in their body such that they find it difficult to find a partner to mate. this will effect their population. slowly this NEW breed will replace the existing parasite carrying breed.
2) 2nd will produce changes such that they kill the parasite before it becomes powerful enough to get transmitted.
3) 3rd stage will weaken the resistance power of these mosquitos so that they themselves die of it rather than transmit..

Now the TWO discrepancies--
1) On one hand we are making changes 2 and 3 so that this new breed kills the parasite and slowly replaces the existing breed, BUT simultaneously the 1st gene is making it difficult to find partner to mate, finally this will effect this new breed too and their gene will not allow them to find partner, which we want to replace with.
2) 2nd and 3rd are almost doing the opposite thing - In a way one is increasing the immunity and the OTHER is destroying it..
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 990
Own Kudos:
1,899
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 990
Kudos: 1,899
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the source of this question is from veritas prep.
Such question will be modified in the actually gmat, I believe so.

B is a common pattern, but in this question, it is hard to recognize the pattern in B.
B is indeed the correct b/c if mosquitoes cannot find mates, or die by its own disease, then mosquitoes will not serve the goal that "the dangerous wild population could eventually be replaced with a harmless one without leaving room for another disease-transmitting type to flourish."
User avatar
bvg
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Last visit: 26 Feb 2023
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V27
GMAT 2: 650 Q32 V48
GRE 1: Q160 V151
GPA: 3.99
WE:Design (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 2: 650 Q32 V48
GRE 1: Q160 V151
Posts: 71
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="Nevernevergiveup"]It is proposed to introduce mosquitoes into the wild with genetic alterations that destroy their disease-carrying capacity. In this way, the dangerous wild population could eventually be replaced with a harmless one without leaving room for another disease-transmitting type to flourish. One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates; another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which of the following identifies a discrepancy in the proposal above?

A. It is presupposed that the three genes would prove equally easy to isolate and insert into the cells of the mosquitoes.
B. Two of the ways of destroying disease carrying capacity in the wild would jeopardize the goal of the proposal.
C. It does not take into account positive roles that mosquitoes play in the environment, such as serving, in the larval stage, as food for fish.
D. None of the proposed alternatives would ensure that there would be fewer mosquitoes in any given area.
E. Evidence is not presented to show that each alternative method has been successfully tested on a wide scale.[/quote]

I didn’t understand option B completely, it says two of the options however only one of the candidate gene is killing the carrier( the third one ) where as the other two seems benine to the mosquito

[size=80][b][i]Posted from my mobile device[/i][/b][/size]
avatar
mini246
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Last visit: 17 Jun 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: India
Posts: 8
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates; another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which of the following identifies a discrepancy in the proposal above


If the mosquito is unable to find a date that means the gene in the mosquito will not pass on to the general population.hence defeats the purpose since the harmful population of mosquitoes won't be replaced. For second discrepancy assume that it is in the final adult stage that the disease develops in the mosquito now either the mosquito dies or the parasite . Again no change in the existing harmful population


Hence B

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,001
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,441
Kudos: 1,825
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nevernevergiveup
It is proposed to introduce mosquitoes into the wild with genetic alterations that destroy their disease-carrying capacity. In this way, the dangerous wild population could eventually be replaced with a harmless one without leaving room for another disease-transmitting type to flourish. One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates; another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which of the following identifies a discrepancy in the proposal above?

A. It is presupposed that the three genes would prove equally easy to isolate and insert into the cells of the mosquitoes.

B. Two of the ways of destroying disease carrying capacity in the wild would jeopardize the goal of the proposal.

C. It does not take into account positive roles that mosquitoes play in the environment, such as serving, in the larval stage, as food for fish.

D. None of the proposed alternatives would ensure that there would be fewer mosquitoes in any given area.

E. Evidence is not presented to show that each alternative method has been successfully tested on a wide scale.


A. Ease or difficulty to isolate or insert is not the concern. Even if the plan is successful with difficulties then it is good.

B. It shows the clear reason that if two ways would jeopardize the plan then plan is almost fails. Plan is to introduce harmless

mosquitoes, but as the premise says "another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before

transmitting the disease"
, this will jeopardize the proposal.

C, D, and E are Irrelevant to the discrepancy.
User avatar
push12345
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Last visit: 10 Feb 2019
Posts: 547
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 547
Kudos: 524
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Our main intent is not to decrease population of mosquitoes but simply replacing them with harmless ones

1st and 3rd reason will decrease population of mosquitoes
1) If the mosquito is unable to find a date that means the gene in the mosquito will not pass on to the general population.hence defeats the purpose since the harmful population of mosquitoes won't be replaced

3)another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease

So mosquitoes will die in this case too


Give kudos if it helps

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
rvgmat12
Joined: 19 Oct 2014
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 189
Location: United Arab Emirates
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja could you please provide your inputs on this?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 14 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,106
Own Kudos:
74,321
 [3]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,106
Kudos: 74,321
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gnpth
It is proposed to introduce mosquitoes into the wild with genetic alterations that destroy their disease-carrying capacity. In this way, the dangerous wild population could eventually be replaced with a harmless one without leaving room for another disease-transmitting type to flourish. One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates; another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted; another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

Which of the following identifies a discrepancy in the proposal above?

A.It is presupposed that the three genes would prove equally easy to isolate and insert into the cells of the mosquitoes.

B.Two of the ways of destroying disease carrying capacity in the wild would jeopardize the goal of the proposal.

C.It does not take into account positive roles that mosquitoes play in the environment, such as serving, in the larval stage, as food for fish.

D. None of the proposed alternatives would ensure that there would be fewer mosquitoes in any given area.

E. Evidence is not presented to show that each alternative method has been successfully tested on a wide scale.

Aim: destroy mosquitoes' disease-carrying capacity

Plan: Introduce mosquitoes with 3 possible genetic alterations:

- One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates;
- another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted;
- another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.

What is the problem with the plan?

A.It is presupposed that the three genes would prove equally easy to isolate and insert into the cells of the mosquitoes.

Does the plan need them to be equally easy to isolate? No. They are just possible options. One could be easier to implement and the other harder (but perhaps better) - we don't know.

B.Two of the ways of destroying disease carrying capacity in the wild would jeopardize the goal of the proposal.

Correct.
We plan to introduce modified mosquitoes and we hope that they will replace the current ones. So they will propagate among the current ones and perhaps pass on their genes to the babies (new mosquitoes) and eventually, when current mosquitoes live out their life cycle, all mosquitoes will have the new genes.
But of the 3 proposals,
- One candidate gene would interfere with the mosquito’s finding mates;
If the introduced mosquitoes are unable to find mates, how will they replace the current population? The current population will continue mating among themselves and propagating.

- another would cause destruction of a disease parasite before the stage at which it could be transmitted;
This is good. The mosquito would kill the parasite before transmitting so the mosquito will become harmless.

- another would disable the mosquito’s own resistance to disease, so that it would die before transmitting the disease.
This again would lead to the introduced mosquitoes being weak and not resistant to disease. So they will die quickly and not be able to propagate. Then how will they replace the current population?

Hence, 2 of the 3 ways are against our goal.

C.It does not take into account positive roles that mosquitoes play in the environment, such as serving, in the larval stage, as food for fish.

Irrelevant.

D. None of the proposed alternatives would ensure that there would be fewer mosquitoes in any given area.

Irrelevant. We only want to make mosquitoes harmless.

E. Evidence is not presented to show that each alternative method has been successfully tested on a wide scale.

Evidence if out of scope for us.

Answer (B)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,446
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,446
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7353 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts