nt2010 wrote:
Not sure how A counters the argument - that stock market is a poor trend of economy - and A states the same.
I would go with E since it explains why stock prices are good indicator for economy trend..
Hi nt2010
I think I can help you a bit.
Fact: As a recession deepens, the stock market soars.
Fact: Later after the economy has become stronger, the market often appears to become shaky.
The main conclusion is: The market is a poor indicator of economic trends.
Assumption is: Stock prices
reflect the current state of the economy. It means what stock prices demonstrate what the economy experiences.
You can
weaken the argument
by showing that the stock prices move faster than the current state of the economy. For instance, as you know the economy NEVER goes up or down FOREVER. There are always peak and trough. After the economy hits the trough, it will go back. The pattern is the same, after the economy hits its peak, it will go down. That's the logic.
How about A?You say:
A states the same. You're not correct. The complete sentence is: "Stock prices do not....,
but rather the expert judgement.......".
A says: "Stock prices
do not reflect the current state of the economy,
but rather the expert judgement of investors
about the future strength of the economy".
Clearly, A attacks the conclusion by showing that the market always moves faster than the current economy. Hence A is correct.
How about E? "
some brokers and analysts believe that the stock market is a useful index of economic trends because it is updated more frequently than other indicators"
You see E says "
Just some brokers and Analysts believe that stock market is good indicators" ==> It also means
other people don't believe, otherwise E should state "Every body believes that....". Thus, E does not weaken the conclusion.
Hope it clears you doubt.
Regards.