It is currently 19 Feb 2018, 21:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 308
GMAT ToolKit User
Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2010, 10:52
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

28% (01:56) correct 72% (01:47) wrong based on 67 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

14. Joshua Smith’s new novel was criticized by the book editor for The Daily Standard as implausible. That criticism, like so many other criticisms from the same source in the past, is completely unwarranted, as anyone who has actually read the novel would agree. Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.
Which one of the following is the most serious error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) It relies on the assumption that a criticism can legitimately by dismissed as unwarranted if it is offended by someone who had previously displayed questionable judgment.
(B) It ignores the fact that people can agree about something even though what they agree about is not the case.
(C) It calls into question the intellectual integrity of the critic in order to avoid having to address the grounds on which the criticism is based.
(D) It takes for granted that a whole story will have a given characteristics if each of its parts has that characteristics.
(E) It attempts to justify its conclusion by citing reasons that most people would find plausible only if they were already convinced that the conclusion was true.


OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
d
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 286
Re: LSAT test VI [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2010, 13:03
vaivish1723 wrote:
14. Joshua Smith’s new novel was criticized by the book editor for The Daily Standard as implausible. That criticism, like so many other criticisms from the same source in the past, is completely unwarranted, as anyone who has actually read the novel would agree. Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.
Which one of the following is the most serious error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) It relies on the assumption that a criticism can legitimately by dismissed as unwarranted if it is offended by someone who had previously displayed questionable judgment.
(B) It ignores the fact that people can agree about something even though what they agree about is not the case.
(C) It calls into question the intellectual integrity of the critic in order to avoid having to address the grounds on which the criticism is based.
(D) It takes for granted that a whole story will have a given characteristics if each of its parts has that characteristics.
(E) It attempts to justify its conclusion by citing reasons that most people would find plausible only if they were already convinced that the conclusion was true.


OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
d


Only D and E are contenders for me.

When the author says that "Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other", he means that incidents are very much plausible and on the same lines on the basis of plausibility of singular events(events finally form the novel), author tries to conclude that novel (in totality)is plausible and the criticism that novel is implausible is unwarranted.

Please let me know, if you have any doubts on this.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 161
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: LSAT test VI [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2010, 20:23
Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.

ans choice D is analogus with this part

so ans is D
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 618
Re: LSAT test VI [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2011, 06:51
hmmm interesting question this, but quite simple too. D is the only plausible flaw in the reasoning, E is a bit weirdly stated but easily eliminated
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1260
Re: LSAT test VI [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2011, 06:38
Characteristic of one has been applied to all is the fallacy used here.

D brings out this issue.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Re: LSAT test VI   [#permalink] 20 May 2011, 06:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.