I lie somewhere between aaudetat and aurobindo.
My question is, how is your application distributed between work and extracurriculars? Since we don't know, I will give you my examples for the three schools I'm currently applying to:
Haas: 7 essays
- All 4 short answer essays are on extracurriculars, even though some are extracurriculars at work
- Leadership Essay is on a work event
- Goals essay is work, of course
- optional essay is about community service
UCLA: 4 essays
- Family Essay is personal
- Leadership essay is work
- Goals essay is work
- optional essay is community service
Stanford: 4 essays (this is the one where I focused mostly on outside)
- Essay A is personal
- Essay B is goals and work
- Essay C1 and 2 are about community service and extracurriculars
So my other essays, word count wise, is roughly 50% work 50% non work. My Stanford essay is a bit different, with 5 of the 7 pages on non-work, and 2 pages on work. Even in those 2 pages, 1 is spent on why Stanford.
I did this for Stanford because they like to see how you made an impact in your personal life, work life, community service, and your hobbies. I fit each of my four essays into one of those bins. The risk is I'm not talking about work enough, but I will leave that to my recommenders to do. Each of them have talking points from me that talk about my leadership abilities at work, so hopefully that's enough.
With that said, you would have to see if the school focuses more on your personal side (like Stanford) or work side. See what your work/non-work distribution is, and make a decision from there.
I generally would lean towards the BETTER story and example of your leadership potential. Yes, b-school is all about work, but if you don't have the opportunities to demonstrate your leadership skills at work, then it'd be better to see it elsewhere and extrapolate that to work.
Good luck!