GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 09 Dec 2019, 19:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1401
Location: NewJersey USA
Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 14:34
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (02:35) correct 27% (02:27) wrong based on 55 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United States were cut in half, an estimated 5,000 lives might be saved each year.

Thomas: How can that be? That would mean that if people adopt this single change in diet for ten years, the population ten years from now will be greater by 50,000 people than it otherwise would have been.

Which one of the following is a statement that Leona could offer Thomas to clarify her own claim and to address the point he has made?

(A) It is possible for the population to grow by 5,000 people for every year if the base year chosen for purposes of comparison is one with unusually low population growth.

(B) It is accurate to say that 5,000 lives have been saved as long as 5,000 people who would have died in a given year as a result of not changing their diet, did not do so-even if they died for some other reason.

(C) If egg consumption were reduced by more than half, the estimated number of lives saved each year could be even more than 5,000.

(D) The actual rate of population growth depends not only on the birth rate, but also on changes in life expectancy.

(E) For the average consumption of eggs to be cut by half, many individual consumers would have to cut their own consumption by much more than half.
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 179
Location: MI
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 16:26
B

The sentence is not framed correctly though....
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 3346
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 16:49
B also. Asandeep, you're always a step ahead of me. still working on the explanation...
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 371
Location: Aus
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 17:09
asandeep wrote:
B

The sentence is not framed correctly though....

Can you explain ? I felt the answer should be D.
VP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1401
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 17:29
Alright folks I timedout expecting a suitable reply from you. Here is what I think. Bye the way I chose D.

Thomas thinks that those people who survived because of the change in the diet would have died otherwise and thus does not consider them to be part of the population over next 10 years. Thus if they are saved then those are the extra people contributing to the population by 50000 over 10 years.
All the answers except B are rediculous. D comes closest but is out of the scope. Then again I have the moral support of Geethu.
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 179
Location: MI
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 18:10
1
Geethu wrote:
asandeep wrote:
B

The sentence is not framed correctly though....

Can you explain ? I felt the answer should be D.

The question asks for a statement that will not only justify Leona's claim but also refute Thomas's claim.
B says,
Part I - It is ok to say 5,000 people are saved as long as they (the same 5,000 people) don't die due to consumption of eggs
This part proves Leona's claim to be true.

Part II - Those 5,000 people could die due to other reasons.
This part refutes Thomas's claim that the population will be 50,000 more in 10 years.
VP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1401
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2003, 18:53
I just tought Thomas misunderstood Leona's statement and Leona clarified it later using the statement in B
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 04:57
Answer B seems to be the best choice here.
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 869
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2019, 08:17
OA added and bumping for further discussion
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: Here
My RC Guide: Here
Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
Re: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United   [#permalink] 26 Nov 2019, 08:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by