Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:02 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
az780
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Last visit: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
436
 [22]
Posts: 71
Kudos: 436
 [22]
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gixxer1000
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Last visit: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 359
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Real Estate Development
Schools:Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Posts: 359
Kudos: 419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bhatia_ash2002
Joined: 18 May 2007
Last visit: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
50
 [1]
Posts: 31
Kudos: 50
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pmenon
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 692
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 692
Kudos: 600
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i think its A as well.

If the population shifts this way, the number of movies viewed per person will increase, without the population having to increase. This in effect increases profits but not necessarily attendance, so, the plan could still work.
User avatar
hanumayamma
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 May 2015
Posts: 366
Own Kudos:
565
 [3]
Posts: 366
Kudos: 565
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: if there is indeed no increase in population, Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to prove profitable.
The weaken argument must mention answer choice that shows possibility that contrdicts or weakens the argument's conclusion.


A. Though little change in the size of the population is expected, a pronounced shift toward a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population is expected to occur. [This will ensure more demand for movie watching - Hold it]

B. The sales of snacks and drinks in its movie theaters account for more of
Lightbox's profits than ticket sales do. [What is more profitable in the theater is not main conclusion – eliminate it]

C. In selecting the mix of movies shown at its theaters, Lightbox's policy is to avoid
those that appeal to only a small segment of the moviegoing population. [What segment of population lightbox movie theater less inclined to serve is out of argument scope – eliminate it]

D. Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, is currently no
longer increasing. [Video purchases and rentals is not even mentioned in the argument – eliminate it]

E. There are no population centers in the county that are not already served by at
least one of the movie theaters that Lightbox owns and operates. [Population centers is out of scope – eliminate it]

Answer: A
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument provides the following premises:
1) Lightbox, Inc., owns almost all of the movie theaters in Washington County
2) It has announced plans to double the number of movie screens it has in the county within five years.
3) Yet attendance at Lightbox's theaters is only just large enough for profitability now and the county's population is not expected to increase over the next ten years.

Conclusion:
Clearly, therefore, if there is indeed no increase in population, Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to prove profitable.

We need to find an option that weakens the conclusion that Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to prove profitable if there's no increase in population.

Option A- says that even though no change in the size of the population is expected, it is expected that there will be a pronounced shift toward a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population. This information goes against the conclusion that Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to be profitable. This weakens the conclusion and is the correct answer.
Option B- compares what is more profitable- sale of snacks or sale of tickets- irrelevant to the argument
Option C- says that Lightbox's policy is to avoid movies that appeal to only a small segment of the moviegoing population. Our conclusion is that if there's no increase in the size of the population, Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to prove profitable. What segment of the population the movies appeal to is beyond the scope of the argument.
Option D- Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, is currently no longer increasing- Again, irrelevant.
Option E- says that there are no population centers in the county that are not already served by at least one of the movie theaters that Lightbox owns and operates. This will only support the conclusion that the new screens are unlikely to be profitable. Hence eliminated.


Vishnupriya
CrackVerbal Prep Team
User avatar
banker08
Joined: 31 May 2021
Last visit: 16 Oct 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 134
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC MiM "24
Schools: ESSEC MiM "24
Posts: 29
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
az780
Lightbox, Inc., owns almost all of the movie theaters in Washington County and has announced plans to double the number of movie screens it has in the county within five years. Yet attendance at Lightbox's theaters is only just large enough for profitability now and the county's population is not expected to increase over the next ten years. Clearly, therefore, if there is indeed no increase in population, Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to prove profitable.

Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Though little change in the size of the population is expected, a pronounced shift toward a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population is expected to occur.

(B) The sales of snacks and drinks in its movie theaters account for more of Lightbox's profits than ticket sales do.

(C) In selecting the mix of movies shown at its theaters, Lightbox's policy is to avoid those that appeal to only a small segment of the moviegoing population.

(D) Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, is currently no longer increasing.

(E) There are no population centers in the county that are not already served by at least one of the movie theaters that Lightbox owns and operates.

Why cant we choose option D. If video purchases and video rentals are no longer increasing, it becomes evident that those customers will now start watching in theaters...?
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Though little change in the size of the population is expected, a pronounced shift toward a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population is expected to occur. [This will ensure more demand for movie watching - Hold it]

B. The sales of snacks and drinks in its movie theaters account for more of
Lightbox's profits than ticket sales do. [What is more profitable in the theater is not main conclusion – eliminate it]

C. In selecting the mix of movies shown at its theaters, Lightbox's policy is to avoid
those that appeal to only a small segment of the moviegoing population. [What segment of population lightbox movie theater less inclined to serve is out of argument scope – eliminate it]

D. Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, is currently no
longer increasing. [Video purchases and rentals is not even mentioned in the argument – eliminate it]

E. There are no population centers in the county that are not already served by at
least one of the movie theaters that Lightbox owns and operates. [Population centers is out of scope – eliminate it]

Answer: A
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts