Last visit was: 03 Sep 2026, 09:07 It is currently 03 Sep 2026, 09:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
happyapple123
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 06 Dec 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
16
 [3]
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 7
Kudos: 16
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NitishJain
User avatar
IESE School Moderator
Joined: 11 Feb 2019
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
209
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 266
Kudos: 209
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
happyapple123
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 06 Dec 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 7
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NitishJain
User avatar
IESE School Moderator
Joined: 11 Feb 2019
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 266
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
happyapple123
NitishJain

I think B is sufficient?

B is sufficient if you plug in m=2 and n=1. Thus m>n. Can't find any examples to prove m<n.

Hello happyapple123

try m = -2 and n = -1,here n >m
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,298
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,088
Kudos: 838,859
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
happyapple123
NitishJain

I think B is sufficient?

B is sufficient if you plug in m=2 and n=1. Thus m>n. Can't find any examples to prove m<n.

For (2) to get a NO answer, try m < 0 and n > 0.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,298
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,088
Kudos: 838,859
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NitishJain
happyapple123
NitishJain

I think B is sufficient?

B is sufficient if you plug in m=2 and n=1. Thus m>n. Can't find any examples to prove m<n.

Hello happyapple123

try m = -2 and n = -1,here n >m

Those values do not satisfy (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m.
User avatar
NitishJain
User avatar
IESE School Moderator
Joined: 11 Feb 2019
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 266
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
NitishJain
happyapple123
NitishJain

I think B is sufficient?

B is sufficient if you plug in m=2 and n=1. Thus m>n. Can't find any examples to prove m<n.

Hello happyapple123

try m = -2 and n = -1,here n >m

Those values do not satisfy (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m.

Correct sir. thanks.
User avatar
happyapple123
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 06 Dec 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 7
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Thanks. Does it mean the answer is C not E then?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,298
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,088
Kudos: 838,859
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
happyapple123
Bunuel

Thanks. Does it mean the answer is C not E then?

The question is flawed. m/n > 1 and (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m cannot simultaneously be true. Is the question really from egmat?
User avatar
Lipun
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 08 Jan 2025
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 291
Posts: 141
Kudos: 167
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
happyapple123
m and n are both integers. Is m>n?

(1) m/n > 1
(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m

Statement 1: \(m/n>1\) implies both m and n are either positive or negative.
Case1: m,n>0 => m>n
Case2: m,n<0 => m<n

Not sufficient.

Statement 2: \((m-n)/n\) < \((m-n)/m\)
Solving the above equation we'll obtain \(m/n+n/m<2\).
Case1: m<n, m=-2, n=5 => -0.4-2.5 < 0
Case2: m>n, m=5, n =-2 => -2.5-0.4 < 0

Not sufficient.

S1 and S2 together:
From S1 we know m,n>0 => m>n----(1) and m,n<0 => m<n-----(2)
m,n>0 => m-n>0. Cancelling the numerator on both sides we obtain \(1/n<1/m\) => \(m<n\). In contradiction with equation (1).
m,n<0 => m-n<0. The negative signs will cancel out in numerator and denominator and we obtain LHS > RHS. This also fails.

S1 contradicts S2. Even for option E, we need S1 and S2 complementing each other but resulting in more than 1 solution in which case we can't determine the exact solution.

Not sure, where I'm going wrong.
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 164
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 6,129
Kudos: 6,086
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
happyapple123
m and n are both integers. Is m>n?

(1) m/n > 1
(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m

Given:m and n are both integers.
Asked: Is m>n?

(1) m/n > 1
m/n - 1 > 0
(m-n)/n>0
If n>0; m>n
But if n<0; m<n
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m
(m-n)/n - (m-n)/m < 0
(m-n)(1/n- 1/m) < 0
(m-n)(m-n)/mn < 0
1/mn < 0; Since (m-n)^2>=0
mn < 0
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) m/n > 1
m/n - 1 > 0
(m-n)/n>0
(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m
(m-n)/n - (m-n)/m < 0
(m-n)(1/n- 1/m) < 0
(m-n)(m-n)/mn < 0
1/mn < 0; mn<0; Since (m-n)^2>=0
If n<0; m>0; m>n
But if n>0; m<0; m<n
NOT SUFFICIENT

IMO E
User avatar
satya2029
Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2025
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Posts: 229
Kudos: 259
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
happyapple123
Bunuel

Thanks. Does it mean the answer is C not E then?

The question is flawed. m/n > 1 and (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m cannot simultaneously be true. Is the question really from egmat?
Excatly.
From 1
m/n>1
and From 2
mn<0
User avatar
satya2029
Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2025
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Posts: 229
Kudos: 259
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kinshook
happyapple123
m and n are both integers. Is m>n?

(1) m/n > 1
(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m

Given:m and n are both integers.
Asked: Is m>n?

(1) m/n > 1
m/n - 1 > 0
(m-n)/n>0
If n>0; m>n
But if n<0; m<n
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m
(m-n)/n - (m-n)/m < 0
(m-n)(1/n- 1/m) < 0
(m-n)(m-n)/mn < 0
1/mn < 0; Since (m-n)^2>=0
mn < 0
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) m/n > 1
m/n - 1 > 0
(m-n)/n>0
(2) (m-n)/n < (m-n)/m
(m-n)/n - (m-n)/m < 0
(m-n)(1/n- 1/m) < 0
(m-n)(m-n)/mn < 0
1/mn < 0; mn<0; Since (m-n)^2>=0
If n<0; m>0; m>n
But if n>0; m<0; m<n
NOT SUFFICIENT

IMO E
From 1
m/n>1
From 2
mn<0
How it is possible that Both are simultaneously true?

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
113088 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts