Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 00:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 00:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [22]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [11]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Jan 2022
Posts: 608
Own Kudos [?]: 445 [0]
Given Kudos: 725
Schools: NUS '25 (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: M06-06 [#permalink]
This is a fairly trippy one given the large number of variables involved. Great question and great explanation by Bunuel.

Posted from my mobile device
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: M06-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
I have edited the question and the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
M06-06 [#permalink]
I find it tough to understand why option d. y = 0 and option e. j = 0 are not always true. Is nt it true that from the 1st equation y = 0 must be true and from the second equation j = 0  must be true since c<k. If not, can someone please explain and elucidate the cases, when y = 0 and j = 0 are not must be true possibles?
Bunuel­
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618867 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: M06-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Shahul^ wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

If \(y(u - c) = 0\) and \(j(u - k) = 0\), which of the following must be true, given \(c < k\)?

A. \(yj \lt 0\)
B. \(yj \gt 0\)
C. \(yj = 0\)
D. \(j = 0\)
E. \(y = 0\)


From \(y(u - c) = 0\), it follows that \(u=c\) or \(y=0\) (or both).

From \(j(u - k) = 0\), it follows that \(u=k\) or \(j=0\) (or both).

Note that \(u=c\) and \(u=k\) cannot simultaneously be correct because if they were, it would imply that \(u=c=k\), but we have been given that \(c < k\). Thus, only one can be correct, which further implies that either \(y=0\) or \(j=0\), making \(yj = 0\) always true.


Answer: C

­

I find it tough to understand that why option d. y = 0 and option e. j = 0 are not always true. Is nt it true that from the 1st equation y must be true and from the second equation j must be true? If not, can someone please explain and elucidate the cases, when y = 0 and j = 0 are not must be true possibles?
Bunuel

­
D, \(j = 0\), is not necessarily true because­ we can have a case when \(y=0\) and ­\(u=k\) (observer, that both \(y(u - c) = 0\) and \(j(u - k) = 0\) hold true for these values). In this case j can be any number, not necessarily 0.

Similarly, E, \(y = 0\), is not necessarily true because­ we can have a case when \(j=0\) and\(u=c\) (observer, that both \(y(u - c) = 0\) and \(j(u - k) = 0\) hold true for these values). In this case j can be any number, not necessarily 0.
 
Hope it helps.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: M06-06 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92900 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne