It is currently 16 Jan 2018, 11:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# M06-06

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43296

Kudos [?]: 139200 [0], given: 12779

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 23:27
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

86% (01:10) correct 14% (01:25) wrong based on 104 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If $$y(u - c) = 0$$ and $$j(u - k) = 0$$, which of the following must be true, assuming $$c \lt k$$?

A. $$yj \lt 0$$
B. $$yj \gt 0$$
C. $$yj = 0$$
D. $$j = 0$$
E. $$y = 0$$
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Kudos [?]: 139200 [0], given: 12779

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43296

Kudos [?]: 139200 [0], given: 12779

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 23:27
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Official Solution:

If $$y(u - c) = 0$$ and $$j(u - k) = 0$$, which of the following must be true, assuming $$c \lt k$$?

A. $$yj \lt 0$$
B. $$yj \gt 0$$
C. $$yj = 0$$
D. $$j = 0$$
E. $$y = 0$$

$$y(u - c) = 0$$. Either $$u=c$$ or $$y=0$$;

$$j(u - k) = 0$$. Either $$u=k$$ or $$j=0$$;

Now, the first option ($$u=c$$ and $$u=k$$) cannot be simultaneously correct for both equations because if it is, then it would mean that $$u=c=k$$, but we are given that $$c \lt k$$. So, only one can be correct so either $$y=0$$ or $$j=0$$, which makes $$yj = 0$$ always true.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 139200 [0], given: 12779

Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2015
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2016, 11:43
Thanks for the explanation. Somehow I missed to guess the logic of u=c and u=k can't happen simultaneously.
And got this wrong. The explanation is crisp and concise.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Intern
Joined: 01 Jan 2016
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 28

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2017, 19:39
Hello Bunuel,
besides the fact that c<k, can't it be "and/or" instead of "or" for each assumption?
y(u−c)=0. Either u=c AND/or y=0? It doesn't change the answer but I would like to know why you didn't include it in your solution. Thank you

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 28

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43296

Kudos [?]: 139200 [1], given: 12779

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2017, 20:01
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Guimeister wrote:
Hello Bunuel,
besides the fact that c<k, can't it be "and/or" instead of "or" for each assumption?
y(u−c)=0. Either u=c AND/or y=0? It doesn't change the answer but I would like to know why you didn't include it in your solution. Thank you

Yes it's an inclusive OR, which means that Either $$u=c$$ or $$y=0$$ (or both).
_________________

Kudos [?]: 139200 [1], given: 12779

Re: M06-06   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2017, 20:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# M06-06

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.