Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 17:00 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 17:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,467
 [84]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
78
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,467
 [22]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
79,375
 [7]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,375
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
lansac
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Last visit: 10 Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
27
 [10]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 3
Kudos: 27
 [10]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is 8

Chicken - ch
Cows - C
Sheep -S

ch+C=3S
C> ch and c>s
Each cow has 4 legs and 1 head
Each chicken has 2 legs and 1 head
So 5c+3ch=100 (sum of legs and head)
There are 2 possible solutions to this equation
c=11 and ch=9 or
c=14 and ch=10

Since from first equation where ch+c=3s

The sum of ch and c should be divisbile by 3. 20 is not so the only possible solution is c=14 and ch=10. So s=8
User avatar
mau5
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 478
Own Kudos:
3,386
 [10]
Given Kudos: 141
Posts: 478
Kudos: 3,386
 [10]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manalq8
A farm has chickens, cows and sheep. There are three times the number of chickens and cows than sheep. If there are more cows than chickens or sheep, and together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads, how many sheep live at the farm?

A. 5
B. 8
C. 10
D. 14
E. 17

Just another approach :

Cows+Chicken = 3*Sheep.

Also, Cows>Chicken and Cows>Sheep.

Also, Cows+Chicken+4*Cows+2*Chicken = 100

or 5Cows+3Chicken = 100 --> 2Cows + 3*(Cows+Chicken) = 100 --> 2Cows + 9*Sheep = 100. Replace the options for Sheep,

A= odd , thus discard
C = # of Cows<# of Sheep, thus discard
D and E = # of Cows coming as negative,discard

B.
User avatar
DJ1986
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Last visit: 16 May 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Real Estate, International Business
GMAT 1: 600 Q33 V40
GPA: 3.3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was confused because I thought that there were 100 feet and (100) heads. Is the real GMAT this ambiguous in the wording?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DJ1986
I was confused because I thought that there were 100 feet and (100) heads. Is the real GMAT this ambiguous in the wording?

In my opinion, the wording is not ambiguous. It says there are a total of 100 feet and heads.
If there were 100 feet and 100 heads, it would have been written as such. Also, then the animals would not have been cows and chickens since per head there need to be at least 2 feet. We certainly cannot have equal number of heads and feet until and unless we are talking about molluscs.
User avatar
DJ1986
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Last visit: 16 May 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
232
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Real Estate, International Business
GMAT 1: 600 Q33 V40
GPA: 3.3
GMAT 1: 600 Q33 V40
Posts: 51
Kudos: 232
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
DJ1986
I was confused because I thought that there were 100 feet and (100) heads. Is the real GMAT this ambiguous in the wording?

In my opinion, the wording is not ambiguous. It says there are a total of 100 feet and heads.
If there were 100 feet and 100 heads, it would have been written as such. Also, then the animals would not have been cows and chickens since per head there need to be at least 2 feet. We certainly cannot have equal number of heads and feet until and unless we are talking about molluscs.

Now that you mention it, what I was thinking really doesn't make sense. I was imagining fried chicken and someone ate all the legs!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
79,375
 [4]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,375
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DJ1986
VeritasPrepKarishma
DJ1986
I was confused because I thought that there were 100 feet and (100) heads. Is the real GMAT this ambiguous in the wording?

In my opinion, the wording is not ambiguous. It says there are a total of 100 feet and heads.
If there were 100 feet and 100 heads, it would have been written as such. Also, then the animals would not have been cows and chickens since per head there need to be at least 2 feet. We certainly cannot have equal number of heads and feet until and unless we are talking about molluscs.

Now that you mention it, what I was thinking really doesn't make sense. I was imagining fried chicken and someone ate all the legs!

:) Don't study on an empty stomach!
avatar
arpithamouli
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 5
Kudos: 7
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A farm has chickens, cows and sheep. There are three times the number of chickens and cows than sheep. If there are more cows than chickens or sheep, and together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads, how many sheep live at the farm?

A. 5
B. 8
C. 10
D. 14
E. 17


Solving this question with a common sense approach,

considering 100 feet and the fact cows>Chicken( 20 cows and 10 chickens which exactly adds upto 100 feet and 30 heads)

Pluging in the answers, when sheep's 5.. the cow+chicken= 15(doesnt make sense)

Sheep's 8 Cow+chicken=24(makes sense because the numbers possible)

Sheep's 10 cow +chicken=30( Values much higher than derived) and hence no need to check for other answers
and the answer is B)8.
User avatar
hellosanthosh2k2
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Last visit: 07 Dec 2020
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
618
 [6]
Given Kudos: 1,227
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 360
Kudos: 618
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chickens - a, cows - b , sheep - c

a + b = 3c
3a + 3b = 9c ----(1)

3a + 5b = 100 (heads and feet)
9c - 3b + 5b = 100
b = 50 - (9c/2) => to make b integer, c must be even

given cows > sheeps => b > c => 50 - (9c/2) > c
= (11c/2) < 50
= c < (100/11) = c <= 9, even number less than 9 in the options is 8 (B)
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,251
Kudos: 328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi VeritasKarishma Bunuel - i was wondering if i can do this problem via ratio's specifically

I laid down the following as ratio's.

Just wondering, am i allowed to assume the unknown multiplier is common across cows / chicken and sheep ?
Attachments

File comment: Ratio attachment
Ratio.JPG
Ratio.JPG [ 55.84 KiB | Viewed 24379 times ]

User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi VeritasKarishma Bunuel - i was wondering if i can do this problem via ratio's specifically

I laid down the following as ratio's.

Just wondering, am i allowed to assume the unknown multiplier is common across cows / chicken and sheep ?

There isn't enough information to use ratios meaningfully.

Why did you start with 2k and 6k?
How about 3k and 9k - Now I can split 9k into '5k and 4k' or '6k and 3k' or '7k and 2k' or '8k and k'.
and so on...
User avatar
Vitthal19
Joined: 02 Dec 2024
Last visit: 25 Oct 2025
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q82 V86 DI81
GPA: 3.95
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q82 V86 DI81
Posts: 9
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the line " If there are more cows than chickens or sheep" because the use of OR means that either cows> chickens or cows>sheeps. I got confused becaused of this that this is a either or this condition should also follow.
what are your thoughts on this because I think this is a small but a genuine error that adds one additional condition which can't be satisfied with any option
KarishmaB
DJ1986
I was confused because I thought that there were 100 feet and (100) heads. Is the real GMAT this ambiguous in the wording?

In my opinion, the wording is not ambiguous. It says there are a total of 100 feet and heads.
If there were 100 feet and 100 heads, it would have been written as such. Also, then the animals would not have been cows and chickens since per head there need to be at least 2 feet. We certainly cannot have equal number of heads and feet until and unless we are talking about molluscs.
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 853
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
Posts: 853
Kudos: 909
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vitthal19
the line " If there are more cows than chickens or sheep" because the use of OR means that either cows> chickens or cows>sheeps. I got confused becaused of this that this is a either or this condition should also follow.
what are your thoughts on this because I think this is a small but a genuine error that adds one additional condition which can't be satisfied with any option
KarishmaB
DJ1986
I was confused because I thought that there were 100 feet and (100) heads. Is the real GMAT this ambiguous in the wording?

In my opinion, the wording is not ambiguous. It says there are a total of 100 feet and heads.
If there were 100 feet and 100 heads, it would have been written as such. Also, then the animals would not have been cows and chickens since per head there need to be at least 2 feet. We certainly cannot have equal number of heads and feet until and unless we are talking about molluscs.

The line means, there are more cows than chickens as well as more cows than sheep (cows > chickens and cows > sheep). If it were an either..or.. statement it would have been written as such.
User avatar
mcepeci
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 30 Jun 2025
Posts: 20
Posts: 20
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The problem states that there are more cows than chickens or Sheep. You wrote Cow>Chickens and Cow>Sheep. However, if it is Or then we know that at least one of those statements are
true. So we really don't know for sure that the number of Cows is more than the the number of sheeps.
Please correct me if I am wrong. Thank you for your help
User avatar
sujoykrdatta
Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Last visit: 14 Apr 2026
Posts: 587
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Mentor & Coach | GMAT Q51 | CAT 99.98
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Posts: 587
Kudos: 1,191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manalq8
On a farm, there are chickens, cows, and sheep. The total number of chickens and cows is three times the number of sheep. If there are more cows than either chickens or sheep, and the combined total of heads and feet of chickens and cows is 100, how many sheep are on the farm?

A. 5
B. 8
C. 10
D. 14
E. 17

Experience GMAT Club Test Questions
Yes, you've landed on a GMAT Club Tests question
Craving more? Unlock our full suite of GMAT Club Tests here
Want to experience more? Get a taste of our tests with our free trial today
Rise to the challenge with GMAT Club Tests. Happy practicing!

Chicken = h, cow = w and sheep = s
h + w = 3s
w>h, w>s
h+w+2h+4w = 100
=> 3h + 5w = 100
Since 100 and 5w are multiples of 5, 3h must be a multiple of 5

Possible cases:
h=5,w=17 => s=(h+w)/3 - not possible
h=10,w=14 => s=8 - possible
h=15,w=11 => s=8.6 - not possible

Other values won't work since w has become smaller than h

Only solution
h=10,w=14,s=8

Ans B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,956
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,956
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109728 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts