Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Question Stats:
36% (01:37) correct 64% (01:39) wrong based on 210 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 01:07



Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 3
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2015, 05:08
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. S1 only tells that \(x\) is an integer. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S2 to S1 will give that \(x\) is an integer bigger than 1. However, if \(x\) is 0, the answer is "no" (\([0] = [0]\)); if \(x\) is positive, the answer is "yes".
Answer: E Hi Bunuel, I think 1st statement is wrong, How can x= [x]+1 ? because x = [x] + {x}, Where {x} is fractional part, which is always less than 1. so x = [x] +1 can't be true in any circumstances.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2015, 06:38
prasadk wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. S1 only tells that \(x\) is an integer. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S2 to S1 will give that \(x\) is an integer bigger than 1. However, if \(x\) is 0, the answer is "no" (\([0] = [0]\)); if \(x\) is positive, the answer is "yes".
Answer: E Hi Bunuel, I think 1st statement is wrong, How can x= [x]+1 ? because x = [x] + {x}, Where {x} is fractional part, which is always less than 1. so x = [x] +1 can't be true in any circumstances. x = [x] + 1 is true for all integers. For example, if x = 3, then [3] = 2 (the largest integer smaller than 3), so 3 = 2 + 1.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 3
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2015, 06:43
Bunuel wrote: prasadk wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. S1 only tells that \(x\) is an integer. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S2 to S1 will give that \(x\) is an integer bigger than 1. However, if \(x\) is 0, the answer is "no" (\([0] = [0]\)); if \(x\) is positive, the answer is "yes".
Answer: E Hi Bunuel, I think 1st statement is wrong, How can x= [x]+1 ? because x = [x] + {x}, Where {x} is fractional part, which is always less than 1. so x = [x] +1 can't be true in any circumstances. x = [x] + 1 is true for all integers. For example, if x = 3, then [3] = 2 (the largest integer smaller than 3), so 3 = 2 + 1. Oh Sorry, My bad. It's "smaller than" , I took it for greatest integer function. You removed "equal to".



Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2014
Posts: 9

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2015, 00:42
Hi Bunuel,
I have only one doubt.. when we combined two statements.. (1) & (2)..
We understood that "x is an integer" and "x>1"
So my Q is when x = 0 then [x] = 1; [x] = 1; Hence [x]<[x] and for all other cases [x]>[x]..
Hence insufficient to draw a conclusion, so option E is correct.
But as per you when x is 0 ([0] = [0]).. it is not as per the context of question which says (largest integer smaller than x)
Am I right? let me know.. thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2015, 02:27



Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Posts: 8

can the question stem be further solved into asking if "x >2?"
if [x] > [x], (x1) > (x1), x > 2?



Intern
Joined: 04 May 2014
Posts: 3

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2017, 19:19
Hi Bunuel,
With all due respect, I want to point out that there is something wrong with the question and the explanation you have provided to one of the fellow students.
The GIF value of an integer I is the integer I itself and not I1, something that you have stated and the explanation implies. It can be understood by the definition and graph plot of the GIF function. [x] : the greatest integer less than or equal to x. Equal when I is an integer of course. [6.4]=6 [6]=6 [6.4]=7



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2017, 03:34
siddharthasthana2212 wrote: Hi Bunuel,
With all due respect, I want to point out that there is something wrong with the question and the explanation you have provided to one of the fellow students.
The GIF value of an integer I is the integer I itself and not I1, something that you have stated and the explanation implies. It can be understood by the definition and graph plot of the GIF function. [x] : the greatest integer less than or equal to x. Equal when I is an integer of course. [6.4]=6 [6]=6 [6.4]=7 Not sure I understand what you mean but the function is defined as "the largest integer smaller than..." not "smaller than or equal to...". There are many other functions, this one is as it is. So, for example, [6.4]=6 and [6.4]=7 but [6]=5, not 6 because the largest integer smaller than 6 is 5.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 04 May 2014
Posts: 3

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2017, 04:58
Hi Bunuel,
This is exactly what I want to point out. The GIF is indeed "the greatest integer less than or EQUAL to x." [6]=6 and not 5. I am unable to copy the link for some reason, but you can check the definition and graph of the function anywhere.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2017, 05:04



Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2017
Posts: 2

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2017, 05:45
X +1 > 0 X CROSS MULTIPLY =  X × 0 > X + 1 = 0 > × + 1



Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2017
Posts: 61
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
Schools: HBS '20, Stanford '20, Wharton '20, Sloan '20, CBS '20, Tuck '20, Yale '20, Johnson '20, INSEAD Jan '19, Insead Sept'18, ISB '19
GPA: 1
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2017, 02:17
Bunuel wrote: If \([x]\) denotes the largest integer smaller than \(x\), is \([x] \gt [x]\)?
(1) \(x = [x] + 1\)
(2) \(x + 1 \gt 0\) This question is part of which topic?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2017, 05:06



Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2017
Posts: 61
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
Schools: HBS '20, Stanford '20, Wharton '20, Sloan '20, CBS '20, Tuck '20, Yale '20, Johnson '20, INSEAD Jan '19, Insead Sept'18, ISB '19
GPA: 1
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2017, 09:48
Bunuel wrote: aashishagarwal2 wrote: Bunuel wrote: If \([x]\) denotes the largest integer smaller than \(x\), is \([x] \gt [x]\)?
(1) \(x = [x] + 1\)
(2) \(x + 1 \gt 0\) This question is part of which topic? This is a rounding functions question. Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory. What these types "[x]" mean? Whenever such variables inside square brackets appear, I become clueless on to handle them or what they mean.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2017, 10:09



Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2017
Posts: 61
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
Schools: HBS '20, Stanford '20, Wharton '20, Sloan '20, CBS '20, Tuck '20, Yale '20, Johnson '20, INSEAD Jan '19, Insead Sept'18, ISB '19
GPA: 1
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2017, 10:24
Bunuel wrote: aashishagarwal2 wrote: What these types "[x]" mean? Whenever such variables inside square brackets appear, I become clueless on to handle them or what they mean.
I think practising the questions from that link should help. Thanks Bunuel.



SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1810

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2017, 00:41
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. S1 only tells that \(x\) is an integer. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S2 to S1 will give that \(x\) is an integer bigger than 1. However, if \(x\) is 0, the answer is "no" (\([0] = [0]\)); if \(x\) is positive, the answer is "yes".
Answer: E Can you elaborate the highlighted part pls? it is not clear enough. Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49418

Re: M1936
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2017, 00:45







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 22 posts ]



