Last visit was: 02 May 2026, 03:08 It is currently 02 May 2026, 03:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,003
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,976
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,003
Kudos: 812,403
 [15]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,003
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,976
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,003
Kudos: 812,403
 [18]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
bennettthecat
Joined: 14 Jul 2015
Last visit: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pocketvenus
Joined: 07 Nov 2015
Last visit: 26 Jan 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
11
 [6]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
Posts: 4
Kudos: 11
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bennettthecat
I still don't understand - this notation is not something I'm familiar with. Is there another way to explain?

Hi,

I thought about the answer in terms of MGMAT's Combinatorics and Probability explanation. This is similar to Bunuel's explanation, but without the notation.


First you need to determine the number of ways that the members can be chosen. The total # of people being considered is 10. That's 10 choices that can be made, so 10!.

From these 10 people, 3 people must be chosen, which also means that 7 people are not chosen. Therefore the equation is written as:

\(\frac{10!}{3! * 7!}\)

The above is if everyone on in the group were the same and we were only choosing 3 people to be on the supervisory committee. However, we know that both students and professors are being considered. And more specifically, at least 1 professor must be chosen. This also implies that it could be 1 professor or 2 or even 3. This makes the problem complicated because we have to determine the number of arrangements for all 3 possibilities. An easier way is to determine the number of arrangements if there were no professors chosen. (This is in the same vein as P[A] = 1 - P[Not A]).

There are 6 students, so again, 6! arrangements. 3 can be on the committee and 3 cannot. So, \(\frac{6!}{3! * 3!}\). This is actually a possibility that we do not want (the prompt asks for at least 1 professor, this gives us the # of arrangements for 0 professors). So we want to subtract this:

\(\frac{10!}{3!7!} - \frac{6!}{3! 3!}\) = 100.

Hope this helpful!
User avatar
ronash
Joined: 14 Sep 2015
Last visit: 03 Mar 2022
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 16
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,
What is wrong with the following:
First select 1 professor and then for the remaining 2 position select any from the 9(6+3) left.
4C1 * 9C2
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,142
Own Kudos:
2,977
 [4]
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,142
Kudos: 2,977
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ronash
Hi Bunuel,
What is wrong with the following:
First select 1 professor and then for the remaining 2 position select any from the 9(6+3) left.
4C1 * 9C2

Hi

In that case there will be repetitions. Say professors are A, B, C, D and students are p, q, r, s, t, u.

When you fix one professor as A, and select 2 out of remaining (9C2) - this will give you 36 cases, and these 36 cases will include such as ABC, ABD, ACD, ABp, ACq,.. etc

Now when you fix one professor as B, and select 2 out of remaining (9C2) - this will again give you 36 cases, including BAC, BAD, BAp... etc

We can clearly see that there are some repetitions in first and second case; and similarly there will be repetitions in further cases. To avoid this overlap, that method by Bunuel is simple and best I think. (there are other ways too but probably more complicated than that method)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,003
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,976
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,003
Kudos: 812,403
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have edited the question and the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.
User avatar
BottomJee
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 09 Jun 2025
Posts: 994
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,009
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 1: 430 Q31 V19
GMAT 2: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.26
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 994
Kudos: 1,465
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
Gg153
Joined: 25 Oct 2024
Last visit: 02 Feb 2026
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 99
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
Alternatively, we can use a direct method:

{The number of committees with at least one professor} =

= {The committees with 1 professor and 2 students} plus {The committees with 2 professors and 1 student} plus {The committees with 3 professors and no students}:

This gives: \(C^1_4*C^2_6+C^2_4*C^1_6+C^3_4=100\).


Answer: E
Why do we not divide each combination by 2! as we did here?
Quote:
The division by 2!, the factorial of the number of teams, is performed because the order of the groups does not matter.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,003
Own Kudos:
812,403
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,976
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,003
Kudos: 812,403
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanya511
Bunuel
Bunuel
Alternatively, we can use a direct method:

{The number of committees with at least one professor} =

= {The committees with 1 professor and 2 students} plus {The committees with 2 professors and 1 student} plus {The committees with 3 professors and no students}:

This gives: \(C^1_4*C^2_6+C^2_4*C^1_6+C^3_4=100\).


Answer: E
Why do we not divide each combination by 2! as we did here?
Quote:
The division by 2!, the factorial of the number of teams, is performed because the order of the groups does not matter.

Good question. The reason we do not divide by 2! in the committee problem is because we are selecting a single group of 3 people, not dividing people into multiple groups. The order of selection does not matter, and there is only one group being formed.

In the other problem with 6 boys, we are dividing them into two separate teams of 3. Since the teams are indistinguishable, selecting Team A as {ABC} and Team B as {DEF} is the same as selecting Team A as {DEF} and Team B as {ABC}. To avoid counting such duplicates, we divide by 2!.

In short:

  • Committee problem: selecting one group, no need to divide by 2!
  • Team division: creating two indistinct groups, so divide by 2! to avoid repeats.
Moderators:
Math Expert
110003 posts
Founder
43181 posts