r_putra_rp
hi
BunuelCan you explain why did you assume that \(x = 7\%\) and \(y = 8\%\) given that their average is \(7.6\%\)
The question gives us that the \(7.6\%\) is the average of the
interest not the average of the
interest rate. If so, shouldn't it be a weighted average ie \(\frac{(x * 7\%) + (y * 8\%)}{(x + y)} = 7.6\%\)?
I mean, even if we take \(\frac{(8+7)}{2} * 100\%\) the result is quite significantly different; \(7.5\%\)
please advise
Here's what the question implies:
$200 was invested in X and earned 7%, therefore $14.
$300 was invested in Y and earned 8%, therefore $24.
A total of $500 was invested and earned 7.6%, therefore $38. The average interest earned is (14 + 24)/500 = 0.076.
However, to avoid ambiguity, I revised the text. I hope it's clearer now. Thank you!
I apologise, but I have hard time to see how the statement implies that 200$ was invested in X and 300$ in Y according to your previous reply.
I tried to solve the problem algebragically but I did not managed. I spent quite a lot of time to understand the logic. There is an alternative aproach to solve this problem?