Last visit was: 12 May 2026, 15:00 It is currently 12 May 2026, 15:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 May 2026
Posts: 110,299
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,204
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,299
Kudos: 814,553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 May 2026
Posts: 110,299
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,204
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,299
Kudos: 814,553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
wolfof6thstreet
Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Last visit: 01 May 2025
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 24
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 May 2026
Posts: 110,299
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,204
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,299
Kudos: 814,553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
wolfof6thstreet
How are you solving for the values for X sub2 thru X sub97 without making the assumption of a repeating pattern?

For instance how do you know that the value of X sub97 is -1? Could X sub 2 thru 96 all be zero and then X sub97 be -96?

It seems like we are assuming something that can't be proven.­
­We are given that 

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{100} = 1\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{99} = 2\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{98} = 3\);

\(...\)

\(x_1= 100\).

From the above we can infer that the pattern shown in the first three lines continues:

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{97} = 4\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{96} = 5\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{95} = 6\);

...

\(x_1= 100\).
 ­
User avatar
wolfof6thstreet
Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Last visit: 01 May 2025
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 24
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
 
wolfof6thstreet
How are you solving for the values for X sub2 thru X sub97 without making the assumption of a repeating pattern?

For instance how do you know that the value of X sub97 is -1? Could X sub 2 thru 96 all be zero and then X sub97 be -96?

It seems like we are assuming something that can't be proven.­
­We are given that 

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{100} = 1\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{99} = 2\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{98} = 3\);

\(...\)

\(x_1= 100\).

From the above we can infer that the pattern shown in the first three lines continues:

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{97} = 4\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{96} = 5\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{95} = 6\);

...

\(x_1= 100\).
 ­


Is this an official question or where is this from?

Never seen an official question where you had to make such a big assumption.

Granted out of the answer choices there is only one likely answer, but still seems like a bad question. For example, imagine if this was a data sufficiency question, assuming (or inferring as you put it) would likely lead to the wrong answer.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 May 2026
Posts: 110,299
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,204
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,299
Kudos: 814,553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
wolfof6thstreet

Bunuel

wolfof6thstreet
How are you solving for the values for X sub2 thru X sub97 without making the assumption of a repeating pattern?

For instance how do you know that the value of X sub97 is -1? Could X sub 2 thru 96 all be zero and then X sub97 be -96?

It seems like we are assuming something that can't be proven.­
­We are given that 


\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{100} = 1\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{99} = 2\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{98} = 3\);

\(...\)

\(x_1= 100\).

From the above we can infer that the pattern shown in the first three lines continues:


\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{97} = 4\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{96} = 5\);

\(x_1+x_2+...+x_{95} = 6\);

...

\(x_1= 100\).
 ­

Is this an official question or where is this from?

Never seen an official question where you had to make such a big assumption.

Granted out of the answer choices there is only one likely answer, but still seems like a bad question. For example, imagine if this was a data sufficiency question, assuming (or inferring as you put it) would likely lead to the wrong answer.

Posted from my mobile device
­I disagree. I believe inferring the above is mathematically sound and logically justified.
Moderators:
Math Expert
110299 posts
Founder
43270 posts