Hi
BunuelThank you for your explanation of the dice problem.
I think I understand the complement method now, but I still feel some confusion about the definition of the event and how the trials are treated.
Specifically, here’s where I got stuck:
When n=2, I imagined rolling 4 dice
“all at once.” Then I thought: if I get two 4’s anywhere among those four dice (for example, (4,2,4,6)), that should count as a “double-4.”
Based on that, I tried to calculate using combinations of positions for the 4’s, and I ended up with a probability of
1/(6^3).
But in your approach, the probability is 1−(35/36)^2 = 71/1296.
This excludes cases like (4,2,4,6)
I thought to ask you these 2 question to better understand the solution

1. Why do we define the event strictly as “both dice showing 4 within a single trial,” rather than “two 4’s appearing anywhere among the total 2n dice”?
2. Is the structure of the problem (phrasing: “the dice are thrown n times”) what forces us to treat each pair of dice as a separate event?
Thank you!