Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Q: Count number of ways to arrange 4 people A, B, C, D in a row so that C, D not sit next to each other
[*] Manhattan solution: (Total number of arrangement - number C, D sit next) Manhattan approach: pretend that C, D stuck together : then Count the number of ways 2 people not sitting next to each other, Total number of arrangements: 4! = 24 then number of ways of arrangement so that C, D next to each other is: 3! = 6. Since C, D are distinct, so all number of ways C, D next to each other is: 6x2 = 12. --> Number of arrangements C, D not sit next: 24 -12 = 12
[*]PFD: (Total number of arrangement - number C, D sit next) PFD approach: Force C sit on D's right by creating 3 slots for D to sit in: seat 1,2,3. After D choose his seat, S automatically sit on his right. So, total number of arrangement where C, D next to each other: 3x1 = 3 ( since D can sit on C's right --> then total arrangement is: 3x2 = 6
---> Number of arrangement C, D not sit next: 24 - 6 = 18 (page 83 PFD) Please help to find the error here? why two answer different
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Q: Count number of ways to arrange 4 people A, B, C, D in a row so that C, D not sit next to each other
[*] Manhattan solution: (Total number of arrangement - number C, D sit next) Manhattan approach: pretend that C, D stuck together : then Count the number of ways 2 people not sitting next to each other, Total number of arrangements: 4! = 24 then number of ways of arrangement so that C, D next to each other is: 3! = 6. Since C, D are distinct, so all number of ways C, D next to each other is: 6x2 = 12. --> Number of arrangements C, D not sit next: 24 -12 = 12
[*]PFD: (Total number of arrangement - number C, D sit next) PFD approach: Force C sit on D's right by creating 3 slots for D to sit in: seat 1,2,3. After D choose his seat, S automatically sit on his right. So, total number of arrangement where C, D next to each other: 3x1 = 3 ( since D can sit on C's right --> then total arrangement is: 3x2 = 6
---> Number of arrangement C, D not sit next: 24 - 6 = 18 (page 83 PFD) Please help to find the error here? why two answer different
Show more
The manhattan way would be the way I do it, and the answer would be 12. I'd imagine either the second way is wrong or it's another problem?
but let's just humor their approach
D C _ _ _ D C _ _ _ D C
then
C D _ _ _ C D _ _ _ C D
looks like 6 ways C D are adjacent, but it doesn't account for A B swapping spots in each of them.
D C _ _ D C A B D C B A
_ D C _ A D C B B D C A
etc. so you;'re missing half the possibilities already. Double the 6 they originally claim you get 12. 24 total possibilities (4!) minus 12 = 12.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.