Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 00:09 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 00:09

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Strengthenx                  
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 113 [19]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63659 [5]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 143 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
But how does C benefits the company as the conclusion says.

Is the OA A?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 617
Own Kudos [?]: 2901 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
Richardson wrote:
Not clear...

Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable employees, free of charge, to improve their physical fitness, reduce stress, and learn ways to stop smoking. These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly strengthens the conclusion above?

(A) Physical fitness programs are often the most popular services offered to employees.
(B) Studies have shown that training in stress management is not effective for many people.-> WEAKENS
(C) Regular exercise reduces people’s risk of heart disease and provides them with increased energy.
(D) Physical injuries sometimes result from entering a strenuous physical fitness program too quickly. -> OOS
(E) Employee assistance programs require companies to hire people to supervise the various programs offered. ->WEAKENS

I got A and C left among other choices. But C is quite normal choice, at least in my opinion. NOrmally right but I couldn't find any remark on "regular exercise" from the question statement. Rather, in A, if the program is the most popular ones for employees, then, the conclusion ("therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee") should be strengthened. How do you guys think???


IMO C
Strengthen means proicide support to premise or assumption to reach the concl :
A->physical fitness service being often offered does not strengthen that they are helpful to employee and employer !!!No comments about increased productivity and reduced absenteesm etc!!Just saying this service is a big hit or often used does not explain why its good Eliminate

C is just better in the given scenario !!!it just strengthens the premise that physical health of emloyees is improved by regular exercise !!!But yes no where in the argument regular exercise is mentioned !!But among given FIVE optins this is the best

HTH
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 175
Own Kudos [?]: 459 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
1
Kudos
C, not a perfect answer,is the better of the other worst options.
A talks of popularity of the program. We have to strengthen the conclusion that the program is beneficial for both employees and the company. Even if you assume that the program being popular means it is beneficial to the employees, there is no mention here of how the popularity of the program makes it beneificial to the employer. Hence eliminated.

B and C actually highlight the negatives of the program- one says the program is not effective, and the second says that it may lead to physical injuried. both deny/negate/dilute the benefots to both employees and employers. Hence straight eliminater.

E is actually unrelated. Hiring more people - is it beneficial to employer or employees? we dont know- no direct correlation. Thue eliminated

C says that regular exercise decreases risk of heart attack- beneficial to employees- and increases energy- can be assumed that this extra energy is used at work and leads to better results- thus beneficial to employer. As for regularity of exercise, nowhere does the question statement talks of programs beig regular or not, it just says that programs help improve fitness etc. So we need not go into how the program does it.

Therefore, I think C with the minor assumption (extra energy = extra work) is the best option we can take out of the available ones.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
1
Kudos
The stimulus talks about the benefits of employee assistance program which includes increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care and concludes stating that this is beneficial for both the company and the employees.

Keeping this mind, if you look at the options,

Option A is very generic and it simply informs that Physical fitness programs are popular services given to employees. This option does not talk about the program relating to the benefits which is the conclusion of the stimulus.

If you take option C, it talks about the health benefits which in turn is good for the employee and the company. If the employee is healthy (read it as reduction in risk of heart attack), then it helps in increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Hence the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Status:Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 153 [0]
Given Kudos: 135
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable employees, free of charge, to improve their physical fitness, reduce stress, and learn ways to stop smoking. These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly strengthens the conclusion above?

(A) Physical fitness programs are often the most popular services offered to employees.
Knowing which programs are popular does not bear on what benefits the programs confer, so choice A is incorrect.

(B) Studies have shown that training in stress management is not effective for many people.
Options B and D indicate ways in which the programs can fail to provide the intended results, so neither of these is the correct answer. It weakens.

(C) Regular exercise reduces people’s risk of heart disease and provides them with increased energy.
Only this option is left, all the other 4 options are eliminated;
The conclusion is that the programs benefit both companies and employees. For companies, reducing employees’ risk of heart disease is likely to reduce insurance costs, and increasing employee energy is likely to increase worker productivity. For employees, the benefits of having a reduced risk of heart disease and of having increased energy are self-evident. Choice C is the best answer.

(D) Physical injuries sometimes result from entering a strenuous physical fitness program too quickly.
Options B and D indicate ways in which the programs can fail to provide the intended results, so neither of these is the correct answer. it weakens.

(E) Employee assistance programs require companies to hire people to supervise the various programs offered.
Having to hire additional personnel does not benefit a company, so choice E is not correct.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
grepro wrote:
But how does C benefits the company as the conclusion says.

Is the OA A?


The question already mentions ways in which the company is benfitted-increase in productivity, less absentisim, etc. And the answer choice C tells us about the benefits that the emloyees receive- lesser risk of heart disease and increased energy.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Status:BDM
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
I think C is the best option out of all but not perfect since the argument only stats about the assistance program but nothing about the regular exercise. It might happen that the program included number of physical activities but not specifically exercises. I think "fitness activities" would have been a better phrase in place of "Regular exercise"
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
grepro wrote:
But how does C benefits the company as the conclusion says.

Is the OA A?

the question is about most significant ......after looking for other options C is the best choice
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Schools: Simon '25
GRE 1: Q161 V158
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
GMATNinja
GMATNinjaTwo

Could you give a better explanation for selecting option C beside POE?

Thanks
Cheers
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
not clear as heart disease is not given in the passage. Isn't???
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1378
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
Sahil9891 wrote:
not clear as heart disease is not given in the passage. Isn't???


Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable employees, free of charge, to improve their physical fitness, reduce stress, and learn ways to stop smoking. These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly strengthens the conclusion above?

(C) Regular exercise reduces people’s risk of heart disease and provides them with increased energy.

You need to look for an option that shows the benefit. --> reduce risk of heart disease and increased energy are clearly benefits . Don't you think so?

Secondly, If you didn't choose C then which option was your selection? You can find that C is most close option that strengthens these programs.

I hope it is clear:)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
How do we approach this question through Pre-Thinking? And not POE..

Option C- while it highlights the benefit (reduced risk of heart disease) it mentions "people". However, the conclusion is about EMPLOYEES and employee assistance programs. People is way more broader audience while the q. specifically mentions employees. Please can you provide an explanation KarishmaB? :)

Thanks in advance.
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5137 [0]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
Expert Reply
havehope wrote:
How do we approach this question through Pre-Thinking? And not POE..

Option C- while it highlights the benefit (reduced risk of heart disease) it mentions "people". However, the conclusion is about EMPLOYEES and employee assistance programs. People is way more broader audience while the q. specifically mentions employees. Please can you provide an explanation KarishmaB? :)

Thanks in advance.

I personally don't recommend pre-thinking because I find it to be a waste of time, but in any case, pre-thinking is a way to think about a question. It's not a great way to arrive at the correct answer since there are many possible answers to a question. So, the correct answer to a question may be quite different from anything you'd come up with by pre-thinking.

In fact, in the case of this question, you wouldn't likely pre-think the credited choice (C), because (C) is not a very good answer to this question. (C) basically just explains why, as the passage says, "These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care." After all, an employee that has a reduced "risk of heart disease" and "increased energy" will likely be more productive and have reduced health care costs. Normally, a choice that explains a premise is not considered a strengthener.

So, really, the only reliable way to get this question correct is via process of elimination of all choices other than (C).

Regarding "people" versus "employees," since employees are people, and since there's no reason to believe that employees are significantly different from other people, what (C) says about "people" can be presumed to apply to "employees."
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17215
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable emplo [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne