gfefhgerlghkjh
I know that several schools have minimum quant scores that they look for. I’ve heard that Stanford wants a 46Q minimum and Tuck has an average of a 47Q.
Is anyone aware of other schools that look extensively at quant and what the minimum score they’d like to see is?
Posted from my mobile deviceThat's a great question to ask at MBA Spotlight MBA Fair. I recommend you register
https://gmatclub.com/forum/mba-spotligh ... 56859.htmlIn the past we have seen some schools indicate they are looking for certain scores, I think that has been a declining trend and most schools are actually open-minded now for the sake of diversity because having the whole class full of quant-strong people and not having any others makes it a weaker program.
I would say that the overall score matters more than each individual section. You can see from the past few years of Tuck admits
https://gmatclub.com/forum/decision-tra ... &status=10 (this is
Decision Tracker filtered by Admits only for Tuck over the last 3 years), you will see a number of Q42's even. Those are outliers but there are several and likely not fakes like this user with Q45
https://gmatclub.com/forum/members/member-794944.html or
Marioep91 who got into Tuck, Yale, and Sloan with 710 Q42 V44. I encourage you to dig in more into the
decision tracker data.
I think the success depends on your background. If you are a financial analyst or finance person and you are applying with a Q45, then perhaps you should change your industry or have a good reason for why your Q is at that level and if you are really an exceptional candidate or just perhaps just put in minimal effort (there are obviously diff stories about why certain people perform differently on standardized tests and that GMAT is not a measurement of intelligence or success frankly, just one's ability to solve high school math under pressure but it remains an effective test and simulates some real-life skills and is a good redeemer if you have a lower GPA).