Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
I am new to the forum but have been preparing for GMAT for a long time. I was reading an article in Financial Times and wanted to share with you a paragraph, which has couple of mistakes.
The UK prime minister gave her assent on Thursday to build Britain’s first new nuclear plant in a generation, but has attached conditions that give it the right to block utility company EDF from selling its stake in the project during construction.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
1. The comma is between two independent clauses, but the subject 'UK prime minister' was not repeated.
2. The IT in the second line is referring to UK. The UK in this sentence is being used as a adjective rather than as a noun. So it cannot definitely reflect to UK.
let me know what you think.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I am new to the forum but have been preparing for GMAT for a long time. I was reading an article in Financial Times and wanted to share with you a paragraph, which has couple of mistakes.
The UK prime minister gave her assent on Thursday to build Britain’s first new nuclear plant in a generation, but has attached conditions that give it the right to block utility company EDF from selling its stake in the project during construction.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
1. The comma is between two independent clauses, but the subject 'UK prime minister' was not repeated.
2. The IT in the second line is referring to UK. The UK in this sentence is being used as a adjective rather than as a noun. So it cannot definitely reflect to UK.
let me know what you think.
Show more
Dear Gmatindianguy,
I'm happy to respond. These days, because of so much competition from free web news, even the best newspapers are between a rock and a hard place. As much as some purists there no doubt would like to maintain lofty standards, compromises toward more colloquial speech are inevitable, as such are necessarily to avoid alienating the less well-spoken consumers. Thus, most regrettably, we cannot expect impeccable GMAT SC quality from any newspapers or any form of writing that is attempting to be be profit-driven.
I would say there are not two independent clauses but two verbs in parallel with one subject. We certainly would not have a comma when the parallel verb phrases are short, but since an infinitive phrase is nested inside the first verb phrase, a comma is helpful for showing the larger organization of the sentence. The use of the comma is not 100% right nor 100% wrong, but acceptable.
With the pronoun, this is a very gray area that definitely would not be tested on the GMAT. Many things determine the antecedent of a pronoun: some are more grammatical, such as proximity and certainly agreement, but some are logical or even rhetorical. In some sense, the big rhetorical presence in the sentence is the nation of Britain: the subject of the sentence, the prime minister, for example, is "tall" only because he's standing on the shoulders of this giant. Because of this rhetorical weight given to the nation of Britain, we could argue that the pronoun is acceptable. Once again, this is much much further down the rabbit-hole of pronouns than the GMAT would ever go.
Does all this make sense? Mike
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.