Pre-Thinking: Law abiding citizens must not be prevented from possessing a gun even at the cost of some criminals obtaining one.
A) The rights of law-abiding citizens are more worthy of protection than are the rights of criminals.
This answer choice is a perfect trap. Placed right as the first option and first half is correct.
1st Half: Rights of Law abiding citizens are "more worthy" of protection"- correct
2nd Half: Than are "rights" of criminals- incorrect. Should be: Than are "dangers" from the criminals (in possession of a gun).
(B) Nothing should be done to restrict potential criminals at the cost of placing restrictions on law-abiding citizens.:
At the first glace, this statement seems a bit extreme- "Nothing should be done". But the tone of the passage suggest that we need to look for a satirical interjection: (so, you mean to say that) nothing should be done to restrict criminals because some law abiding citizens are denied an access to a hand gun. Hence, this answer choice stands correct (on a closer analysis).
(C) Legislation should not be enacted if no benefit could accrue to society as a whole:
Benefit of criminals- incorrect. (dangers from criminals).
(D) No restrictions should be placed on the sale of merchandise unless sale of that merchandise could endanger innocent people.
Merchandise- gun.
Opposite statement. Supporting the legislation.
(E) Even citizens who are neither fugitives nor felons should not be permitted to own a handgun unless they have received adequate training.:
Training: Out of scope to the topic in discussion.