Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 04:00 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 04:00

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2003
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: california
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2008
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 307 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Number properties [#permalink]
IMO E
we are assuming zx/xz to be product of x and z.
what if zx and xz are 2-digit integers formed by x and z ?

take for example 41 and 14....
also. stem says z is a non-negative...it can be 0 as well....

so we may have a case 40-04....But the question says nothing of X..
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Number properties [#permalink]
I'm going to be even more bold than masuhari and say that as long as x and z are *any real numbers* that answer will be 0. Multiplication is commutative, so \(xz-zx=xz-xz=0\) no matter what x and z are! As far as I'm concerned all the extra information (the sign of x and z, the divisor stuff) is a red herring designed to trick you.

And woohoo for Latex in the forum!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Number properties [#permalink]
I pick c.

To satisfy that (2,066)z is a divisor of 3,176,793, z must be a positive number.
As stated in the question, x is a positive integer as well.
One positive integer multiplies another positive integer, no matter what their sequences are, the results are the same. So zx – xz must be 0.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 232 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Number properties [#permalink]
No, it really is that easy. The question is testing your ability to see what information is really necessary to answer the question. The whole thing about divisors and that seven digit number has nothing to do with it.

Whenever the GMAT intends something like "zx" to mean "a two digit number where the first digit is z and the second is x", they tell you so very explicitly and clearly. When they simply write zx in an algebraic expression, it means z times x.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2008
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 307 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Number properties [#permalink]
thanks for that info..!!
it must C then.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Number properties [#permalink]
Moderator:
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne