Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
I was doing problem in Manhattan GMAT math series (inequalities) and they way they rounded the number threw me off at first, i think i understand it now but would like your opinion
It's about a biker crossing a distance of 225 miles rounded to the nearest mile, in 5 hours rounded to the nearest hours, what was his lowest possible and highest possible speed
I interpreted the 225 miles rounding to mean that he must have cycled 224.5 (minimum to round up to 225) and 225.4
In the solution they say its between 224.5 and 225.5
So the difference is in the upper limit
After thinking about it the mention that it is strictly between those numbers, and those numbers aren't included ? so Speed < 225.5 is that what they mean ? Cause 225.5 rounds up to 226, but a fraction less than 225.5 is 225.499... which rounds down to 225
Is that the correct logic or did I miss something ?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I think what they meant is using the upper limit of one side of the inequality and the lower limit of the other side of the inequality. In essence, they're taking the bound of values on each side of 225 that would be rounded to 225, i.e.
\(224.5 <= 225 < 225.5\)
225.499 would round to 225.5 and that would also round to 226. The largest possible fraction to round to 225 would be 225.44444444 .... 49.
I am not really sure what logic they're using. But I might just guess that estimating this kind of a recurring decimal is hard, and they just decided to go with the 225.5.
Hey thanks whiplash, i think your explanation is probably the case in terms of how they thought about it
My remaining doubt would be regarding how you round 225.4999 , if a question, not related lets say, just asked to round 225.4999 to the nearest units digits, i was under the impression that it would round to 225.0 because the 4 drops no ? even if it is followed by 9, or does the rounding "cascade" so to speak ?
You are right in assuming that 225.4999 would be rounded to 225.
I was talking about 225.49, for instance. I am not really sure how the rule would work in this case since 225.49 can be rounded to 225.5 which would eventually be rounded to 226. I am not really sure as to what constitutes the break off point for rounding something DOWN instead of UP
Rounding is simplifying a number to a certain place value. To round the decimal drop the extra decimal places, and if the first dropped digit is 5 or greater, round up the last digit that you keep. If the first dropped digit is 4 or smaller, round down (keep the same) the last digit that you keep.
Example: 5.3485 rounded to the nearest tenth = 5.3, since the dropped 4 is less than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest hundredth = 5.35, since the dropped 8 is greater than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest thousandth = 5.349, since the dropped 5 is equal to 5.
So if \(x\) was rounded to the nearest mile and the result is 225, then it must be true that \(224.5\leq{x}<225.5\).
kuharido
Hey thanks whiplash, i think your explanation is probably the case in terms of how they thought about it
My remaining doubt would be regarding how you round 225.4999 , if a question, not related lets say, just asked to round 225.4999 to the nearest units digits, i was under the impression that it would round to 225.0 because the 4 drops no ? even if it is followed by 9, or does the rounding "cascade" so to speak ?
what do you think ?
Show more
whiplash2411
You are right in assuming that 225.4999 would be rounded to 225.
I was talking about 225.49, for instance. I am not really sure how the rule would work in this case since 225.49 can be rounded to 225.5 which would eventually be rounded to 226. I am not really sure as to what constitutes the break off point for rounding something DOWN instead of UP
Show more
225.49 rounded to the nearest mile would be 225 since the dropped 4 (the first dropped digit) is less than 5.
Hope it's clear.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.