Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 02:29 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 02:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatblast
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Location: Illinois
Posts: 190
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
crackgmat3
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Last visit: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Location: US
Posts: 88
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Alex_NL
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 100
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatblast
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Location: Illinois
Posts: 190
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alex_NL
I would say E but with an different interpretation.

If all the 120 fliers stopped at least at on place, I think the total of fliers that stopped at both cities is 63.
87 + 96 - 63 = 120

But we do not know if all the 120 fliers stopped at least in on place, so we cannot know how many did stop.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Regards,

Alex


I applied the same logic and came up with E as answer. But the OA is C, which i think is obviously wrong. The question is from peterson's guide.
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is not possible to know without knowing the number of planes which did not make ANY stopover at all
User avatar
Alex_NL
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 100
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gmatblast,

Can you tell us the explanation from Peterson.
Maybe we overlook something or maybe we get the right point.

Regards,

Alex
User avatar
gmatblast
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Location: Illinois
Posts: 190
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alex_NL
Gmatblast,

Can you tell us the explanation from Peterson.
Maybe we overlook something or maybe we get the right point.

Regards,

Alex


I do not think we overlooked anything here. Peterson, in its explanation, simply assumes that ALL the fiers made stopover in either Chicago or St. Louis



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts