Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
The Official Guide explains that the answer can be reached by counting the number of routes manually. But that does not sit well within me. I also found that few club members tried to solve the problem using combination formulas. However, there is no sufficient support for the reasoning. Please see: https://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=1790
Question:
Is there really an alternative solution available for this problem without counting routes manually? If so, please explain in detail.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I can just say that a similar question was in my test a year ago. Although there were 10 paths up and 10 to the right > at 9th there were 2 options, etc .. so there were like 200 possibilities, no way you can do it manually
I though you were asking about solution not the formula I.e. how do you know given formula always works? The key here is to rephrase the problem from obscure form given into something mathematical.
You write each solution as a fixed sequence of slots (number of columns/rows) filled up with numbers you get from splitting up number of rows/columns. Then count.
And yes, OG is right. It is much faster to do some counting with elimination because the numbers here are small.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.