It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 13:48
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:55) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a professor delivered a lengthy and tiresome address the central thesis of which was that "yes" and related slang words such as "yeah" can be used only to show agreement with a proposition. At the end of the paper, a listener in the back of the auditorium stood up and shouted in a sarcastic voice, "Oh, yeah?" This constituted a complete refutation of the paper.

The listener argued against the paper by
A) offereing a counter-example
B) pointing out an inconsistency
C) presenting an analogy
D) attacking the speaker's character
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 13:51
I believe A and B are contenders. I will go with B on this one.

Prety weird CR!

I chose B because acceptance can be either way: to reject the proposal or to accept the proposal. It depends on what the person is noding his/her head for. So there is an inconsistency in the thesis here. I could not see any counter example here.

Last edited by anandnk on 26 Mar 2004, 16:28, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: illinois

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 14:05
B on this One.... WOW, PAUL: can we expect this kind of CR's in the Real Exam???

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 651

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 14:51
Another good one - simple yet deep in testing the concept!

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 21:32
D & E are out immediately.

C--There is no analogy.
A--The speaker never presented any kind of example, needless to say, there cant be a counter-example to NO example.

B it is
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 21:41
Ok, A is OA on this one. A and B were very close and the difference was subtle. Answer given is not good so here is my own explanation. A gives a counter-example because "oh yeah" is an instance when "yeah" is exactly the opposite of what the professor intended it to be.
B, the next best choice, talks about pointing out an inconsistency. Well, it is more likely that the listener's comment was inconsistent with the professor's claim but the listener does not really point out any "flaw" or "inconsistency" per se in the use of "yeah"
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 21:47
Paul wrote:
Ok, A is OA on this one. A and B were very close and the difference was subtle. Answer given is not good so here is my own explanation. A gives a counter-example because "oh yeah" is an instance when "yeah" is exactly the opposite of what the professor intended it to be.
B, the next best choice, talks about pointing out an inconsistency. Well, it is more likely that the listener's comment was inconsistent with the professor's claim but the listener does not really point out any "flaw" or "inconsistency" per se in the use of "yeah"

I hate it whne that happens. It was a tough one, and I just had to go with B, although I didnt like the word "Inconsistency"
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2004, 22:00
Hi lvb9th

I am sure many people are taking shots at these CRs. be happy that you nailed two best answers. I can get 10 lawyers who will get this Q wrong.

Anand.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

26 Mar 2004, 22:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.