Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products. Ends 6/1
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
10 Sep 2009, 09:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
I curious,... I thought that in order to solve an equation (or in the case of a D.S. question - in order to know if one possibility is "SUFF"), that an equation must have only one variable.
In other words, if we are given the equation:
2a + 5b = 20
then we can't solve it without any other info. But if we try to simplify it down to finding "a" then we get:
2a = 20 - 5b or a = 10 - (5/2)b
If we try to plug in the equation again we get:
2[10 - (5/2)b] + 5b = 20 or 20 - 5b + 5b = 20 or
20 = 20
which leaves us with nothing.
But if a question has two equations, then we could use this plug-n-play approach to find the variables.
So, after trying to tackle the attached Kaplan D.S. question, I'm left wondering..... In both possibilities, it states that there is one equation, two variables but the first possibility states that we move to the second and then, all of a sudden, it's possible to solve one equation, two variables ??
What's going on here?
In other words, if we are given the equation:
2a + 5b = 20
then we can't solve it without any other info. But if we try to simplify it down to finding "a" then we get:
2a = 20 - 5b or a = 10 - (5/2)b
If we try to plug in the equation again we get:
2[10 - (5/2)b] + 5b = 20 or 20 - 5b + 5b = 20 or
20 = 20
which leaves us with nothing.
But if a question has two equations, then we could use this plug-n-play approach to find the variables.
So, after trying to tackle the attached Kaplan D.S. question, I'm left wondering..... In both possibilities, it states that there is one equation, two variables but the first possibility states that we move to the second and then, all of a sudden, it's possible to solve one equation, two variables ??
What's going on here?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Attachments
ScreenHunter_02 Sep. 10 17.55.gif [ 19.41 KiB | Viewed 58842 times ]
10 Sep 2009, 10:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi Stilite,
You're slightly misremembering the rule, though it's understandable as the distinction is subtle.. The rule is that in order to solve for all variables in a system of equations, we need at least as many equations as we have variables. It is mathematically impossible for a single equation to give us values for both a and b. However, since we only need the value of one variable in this problem, b, it is possible for a single equation to give us a solution; we just need an equation where we can get rid of all the A's.
In this case, because we have +a on both sides, the a's cancel out--leaving us with a single variable equation with nothing but b's and numbers. This is a common trap in DS questions. Keep your eyes peeled for variables that aren't really there!
You're slightly misremembering the rule, though it's understandable as the distinction is subtle.. The rule is that in order to solve for all variables in a system of equations, we need at least as many equations as we have variables. It is mathematically impossible for a single equation to give us values for both a and b. However, since we only need the value of one variable in this problem, b, it is possible for a single equation to give us a solution; we just need an equation where we can get rid of all the A's.
In this case, because we have +a on both sides, the a's cancel out--leaving us with a single variable equation with nothing but b's and numbers. This is a common trap in DS questions. Keep your eyes peeled for variables that aren't really there!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
