Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
10 Sep 2009, 09:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
I curious,... I thought that in order to solve an equation (or in the case of a D.S. question - in order to know if one possibility is "SUFF"), that an equation must have only one variable.
In other words, if we are given the equation:
2a + 5b = 20
then we can't solve it without any other info. But if we try to simplify it down to finding "a" then we get:
2a = 20 - 5b or a = 10 - (5/2)b
If we try to plug in the equation again we get:
2[10 - (5/2)b] + 5b = 20 or 20 - 5b + 5b = 20 or
20 = 20
which leaves us with nothing.
But if a question has two equations, then we could use this plug-n-play approach to find the variables.
So, after trying to tackle the attached Kaplan D.S. question, I'm left wondering..... In both possibilities, it states that there is one equation, two variables but the first possibility states that we move to the second and then, all of a sudden, it's possible to solve one equation, two variables ??
What's going on here?
In other words, if we are given the equation:
2a + 5b = 20
then we can't solve it without any other info. But if we try to simplify it down to finding "a" then we get:
2a = 20 - 5b or a = 10 - (5/2)b
If we try to plug in the equation again we get:
2[10 - (5/2)b] + 5b = 20 or 20 - 5b + 5b = 20 or
20 = 20
which leaves us with nothing.
But if a question has two equations, then we could use this plug-n-play approach to find the variables.
So, after trying to tackle the attached Kaplan D.S. question, I'm left wondering..... In both possibilities, it states that there is one equation, two variables but the first possibility states that we move to the second and then, all of a sudden, it's possible to solve one equation, two variables ??
What's going on here?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Attachments
ScreenHunter_02 Sep. 10 17.55.gif [ 19.41 KiB | Viewed 58948 times ]
10 Sep 2009, 10:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi Stilite,
You're slightly misremembering the rule, though it's understandable as the distinction is subtle.. The rule is that in order to solve for all variables in a system of equations, we need at least as many equations as we have variables. It is mathematically impossible for a single equation to give us values for both a and b. However, since we only need the value of one variable in this problem, b, it is possible for a single equation to give us a solution; we just need an equation where we can get rid of all the A's.
In this case, because we have +a on both sides, the a's cancel out--leaving us with a single variable equation with nothing but b's and numbers. This is a common trap in DS questions. Keep your eyes peeled for variables that aren't really there!
You're slightly misremembering the rule, though it's understandable as the distinction is subtle.. The rule is that in order to solve for all variables in a system of equations, we need at least as many equations as we have variables. It is mathematically impossible for a single equation to give us values for both a and b. However, since we only need the value of one variable in this problem, b, it is possible for a single equation to give us a solution; we just need an equation where we can get rid of all the A's.
In this case, because we have +a on both sides, the a's cancel out--leaving us with a single variable equation with nothing but b's and numbers. This is a common trap in DS questions. Keep your eyes peeled for variables that aren't really there!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
