Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 07:17 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 07:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions
User avatar
PrashantPonde
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2025
Posts: 311
Own Kudos:
2,786
 [22]
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 311
Kudos: 2,786
 [22]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
plumber250
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Last visit: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 213
Own Kudos:
973
 [7]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Posts: 213
Kudos: 973
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
PrashantPonde
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2025
Posts: 311
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 311
Kudos: 2,786
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CleanSlate
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 13 Feb 2022
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 118
Status:K... M. G...
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-27-2013
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 23
Kudos: 22
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plumber250
Good Afternoon. Here is how my brain worked through this problem:

Our reading program teaches third graders to use phonics to sound out multi-syllabic words by pronouncing prefixes and suffixes separately from base words, and then reading the word parts all together. Since children are still primarily reading aloud at this age, this approach ensures comprehension even in books that contain a high percentage of multi-syllabic words.

So no actual argument here, and a heck of a lot of very complicated vocab. Basically it seems to be about how 3rd graders are taught to read. Don't need to worry about too much more now.

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?

So, in the passage there is an assumption. I've not read the passage in enough detail to know what that might be. So time to go through one by one....

A. Students will recognize multi-syllabic words when they hear them. This seems to be plausible. Reading the paragraph, it's not stated anywhere that students are taught to recognise multi-sylable words. Yet the approach is based on them being spotted and disected.
B. Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes.Seems wrong. Both from the context of the passage, but crucially from common sense - we know long words are not all made with prefixes and suffixes, it would be a crazy system if it assumed this.
C. Third graders struggle more than other students with multi-syllabic words. Not assumed anywhere. This is just how 3rd graders are taught, there is probably some truth that the young 3rd garders need to overcome this barrier before they can move up the ranks, but that's not said in the passage.[
D. Comprehension is less important than sounding out words. Just plain wrong. This passage is all about improving comprehension. Again common sense helps here - of course any reading course is going to be about learning what words mean not just saying them out loud.
E. Other reading programs do not focus on multi-syllabic words.In no way assumed. We have no reference to, or anything to tell us about other programmes. This is just a story about one programme

So overall quite tricky. Here is a good example of common sense really helping. Some of the suggestions were so perverse for a reading course that they were very likely to be wrong, even before analysis


Hi , Thanks for the explanation,

Just got a doubt with option A. The argument takes about the third grader but the option talks about whole students. How we can rely on this. is this option is selected by elimination process.
User avatar
plumber250
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Last visit: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 213
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Posts: 213
Kudos: 973
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi FTG,

I don't have that same problem with A.

If something applies to 'all students' then as '3rd graders' are a subset of 'all students' then it must apply to them to.

Cheers

James
avatar
akadmin
Joined: 17 May 2015
Last visit: 03 May 2018
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 190
Posts: 22
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plumber250
Good Afternoon. Here is how my brain worked through this problem:

Our reading program teaches third graders to use phonics to sound out multi-syllabic words by pronouncing prefixes and suffixes separately from base words, and then reading the word parts all together. Since children are still primarily reading aloud at this age, this approach ensures comprehension even in books that contain a high percentage of multi-syllabic words.

So no actual argument here, and a heck of a lot of very complicated vocab. Basically it seems to be about how 3rd graders are taught to read. Don't need to worry about too much more now.

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?

So, in the passage there is an assumption. I've not read the passage in enough detail to know what that might be. So time to go through one by one....

A. Students will recognize multi-syllabic words when they hear them. This seems to be plausible. Reading the paragraph, it's not stated anywhere that students are taught to recognise multi-sylable words. Yet the approach is based on them being spotted and disected.
B. Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes.Seems wrong. Both from the context of the passage, but crucially from common sense - we know long words are not all made with prefixes and suffixes, it would be a crazy system if it assumed this.
C. Third graders struggle more than other students with multi-syllabic words. Not assumed anywhere. This is just how 3rd graders are taught, there is probably some truth that the young 3rd garders need to overcome this barrier before they can move up the ranks, but that's not said in the passage.[
D. Comprehension is less important than sounding out words. Just plain wrong. This passage is all about improving comprehension. Again common sense helps here - of course any reading course is going to be about learning what words mean not just saying them out loud.
E. Other reading programs do not focus on multi-syllabic words.In no way assumed. We have no reference to, or anything to tell us about other programmes. This is just a story about one programme

So overall quite tricky. Here is a good example of common sense really helping. Some of the suggestions were so perverse for a reading course that they were very likely to be wrong, even before analysis


My accuracy on CR 700+ level questions is very low. How do I improve it?
avatar
Kanika3agg
Joined: 09 May 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
82
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 96
Kudos: 82
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Our reading program teaches third graders to use phonics to sound out multi-syllabic words by pronouncing prefixes and suffixes separately from base words, and then reading the word parts all together. Since children are still primarily reading aloud at this age, this approach ensures comprehension even in books that contain a high percentage of multi-syllabic words.

Pre-thinking - Conclusion - Students comprehend multi syllabic words
Argument 1 - Children are reading aloud at this stage
Argument 2 - Segregating words into different parts and reading them together

Assumption - Students can comprehend words when they hear them.

The approach of the summer reading program assumes which of the following about third graders’ comprehension of multi-syllabic words?

A. Students will recognize multi-syllabic words when they hear them. - As is stated in assumption
B. Multi-syllabic words are all composed of prefixes and suffixes. - Very extreme statement.
C. Third graders struggle more than other students with multi-syllabic words. - Irrelevant comparison for our conclusion.
D. Comprehension is less important than sounding out words. - Doesnt matter which is important.
E. Other reading programs do not focus on multi-syllabic words. - May or may not be but still doesnt say anuthing about comprehension of students.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,421
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,421
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts