Last visit was: 27 Jul 2024, 01:26 It is currently 27 Jul 2024, 01:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94619
Own Kudos [?]: 644240 [1]
Given Kudos: 86770
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 170 [1]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.14
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 102 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94619
Own Kudos [?]: 644240 [0]
Given Kudos: 86770
Send PM
Re: Over the past 6 years, prices of peripheral computer equipment in [#permalink]
Expert Reply

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



Over the past 6 years, prices of peripheral computer equipment in Country X, such as printers, mice, and keyboards, have dropped significantly. However, the revenues of computer stores in Country X have increased over the same period.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to reconciling the seeming discrepancy described above?



A. Prices of personal computers have also decreased over the past 6 years.

Incorrect.

This is a Paradox question, so it is made up of premises only; you need to find a new premise which best resolves the apparent discrepancy between the existing premises:

    Premise A: in the past 6 years, the prices of computer accessories have dropped by a lot

    Premise C: revenues of computer stores increased during this period

    Resolving Premise: ?

This answer choice emphasizes the discrepancy. If there were a decrease not only in the prices of peripheral computer equipment but also in the prices of personal computers, we would expect the revenues of computer stores in Country X to decrease further, not to increase.



B. Over the past 6 years, the prices of peripheral computer equipment in Country Y have soared.

Incorrect.

Country Y is outside the scope of this argument.



C. Over the past 6 years, the prices of peripheral computer equipment in Country Y have decreased.

Incorrect.

Country Y is outside the scope of this argument.



D. Sales of computers in Country X have increased by more than 200% over the past 6 years.

If the sales of actual computers in Country X soared dramatically, the revenues of computer stores would also rise, despite the drop in the prices of the other equipment.


E. The number of computer stores in Country X has more than doubled over the past 6 years.

Incorrect.

This is a Paradox question, so it is made up of premises only; you need to find a new premise which best resolves the apparent discrepancy between the existing premises:

    Premise A: in the past 6 years, the prices of computer accessories have dropped by a lot

    Premise C: revenues of computer stores increased during this period

    Resolving Premise: ?

The number of stores in Country X is irrelevant to the paradox between lower prices and higher revenues. It can be argued that more stores indicates a greater market and therefore more items sold, but this argument would be based on too many assumptions - instead on what is stated in this answer choice.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Over the past 6 years, prices of peripheral computer equipment in [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts