Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
14 May 2023, 23:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Prompt:
“The profitability of Croesus Company, recently restored to private ownership, is a clear indication that businesses fare better under private ownership than under public ownership.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
AWA Evaluation Request - Please review this, thanks.
The author claims that organisations’ performance improves under private ownership instead of under public ownership. This claim is supported by the specific example of Croesus company. According to the author, this company had improved profitability since it was turned private. The conclusion is clearly over-stretched and has various flaws in its reasoning.
First, the author has used just a single business’s example to make a strong generalization. There are many factors that directly and indirectly impact the profitability of an organization, such as the market share, unique selling propositions of the products and services, the brand value, productivity of the company and the financial health of the company. All these factors have a considerable impact of the profitability of a company. To attribute the improved profitability only to the switch from public to private ownership in the case of Croesus company is unsubstantiated and highly unlikely. Agreed that management of the company does impact its profitability, but there are many other factors involved. So without a deep understanding of the overall business of Croesus company, it is difficult to claim that profitability was a result of the recent ownership change.
Second, ownership change indicates change in management and the way the company operates and undertakes strategic decisions. These factors, while important, show results in the long term and not immediately. For example, if the management decides to introduce a new line of products or changes its distribution model, the profitability would be impacted in the long run, but the results will not show immediately. Hence, it is safe to assume that the profitability of Croesus company is, at best, correlated to the recent change of ownership, but not caused solely due to the ownership change.
Furthermore, the conclusion states that businesses fare better under private ownership. The supporting example, however, only discusses one factor – profitability. These are various other factors that are used to determine whether a business is doing well, such as, the cash flow, working capital, market share, entry barriers, consumer preferences, and other industry specific considerations. Thus, using only profitability to claim that a particular form of ownership is better than another is far-fetched.
In conclusion, the argument is weak and the example of a single company is not strong enough to support the same. In order to strengthen the argument, the author could have provided more specific information about the business of Croesus company that directly proved the impact of the ownership change. Also, to support the conclusion, examples and information of more companies from varied industries would be helpful. With this information, the argument will have a stronger reasoning.
“The profitability of Croesus Company, recently restored to private ownership, is a clear indication that businesses fare better under private ownership than under public ownership.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
AWA Evaluation Request - Please review this, thanks.
The author claims that organisations’ performance improves under private ownership instead of under public ownership. This claim is supported by the specific example of Croesus company. According to the author, this company had improved profitability since it was turned private. The conclusion is clearly over-stretched and has various flaws in its reasoning.
First, the author has used just a single business’s example to make a strong generalization. There are many factors that directly and indirectly impact the profitability of an organization, such as the market share, unique selling propositions of the products and services, the brand value, productivity of the company and the financial health of the company. All these factors have a considerable impact of the profitability of a company. To attribute the improved profitability only to the switch from public to private ownership in the case of Croesus company is unsubstantiated and highly unlikely. Agreed that management of the company does impact its profitability, but there are many other factors involved. So without a deep understanding of the overall business of Croesus company, it is difficult to claim that profitability was a result of the recent ownership change.
Second, ownership change indicates change in management and the way the company operates and undertakes strategic decisions. These factors, while important, show results in the long term and not immediately. For example, if the management decides to introduce a new line of products or changes its distribution model, the profitability would be impacted in the long run, but the results will not show immediately. Hence, it is safe to assume that the profitability of Croesus company is, at best, correlated to the recent change of ownership, but not caused solely due to the ownership change.
Furthermore, the conclusion states that businesses fare better under private ownership. The supporting example, however, only discusses one factor – profitability. These are various other factors that are used to determine whether a business is doing well, such as, the cash flow, working capital, market share, entry barriers, consumer preferences, and other industry specific considerations. Thus, using only profitability to claim that a particular form of ownership is better than another is far-fetched.
In conclusion, the argument is weak and the example of a single company is not strong enough to support the same. In order to strengthen the argument, the author could have provided more specific information about the business of Croesus company that directly proved the impact of the ownership change. Also, to support the conclusion, examples and information of more companies from varied industries would be helpful. With this information, the argument will have a stronger reasoning.
14 May 2023, 23:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates a high level of coherence and connectivity. The ideas are well-organized and logically presented. The essay follows a clear structure, with an introduction that states the argument, body paragraphs that analyze the flaws in the reasoning, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points. Transitions between paragraphs are smooth, guiding the reader through the essay effectively.
Word structure: 5/6
The word structure is generally strong throughout the essay. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures to convey their ideas. There are no major issues with word choice, and the essay demonstrates a good command of vocabulary and language usage. However, there are a few instances where sentence structure could have been improved for clarity and precision.
Paragraph structure and formation: 5.5/6
The essay follows a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph addressing a specific flaw in the argument. The paragraphs are well-developed and provide adequate explanation and evidence to support the points being made. The writer effectively uses topic sentences to introduce the main idea of each paragraph and provides relevant examples and explanations to support their analysis.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The essay exhibits a strong command of language and grammar. The sentences are generally well-constructed, and there are no major grammatical errors. The writer effectively uses appropriate verb tenses and maintains consistency in language usage. There are a few minor instances where sentence structure could be improved for greater clarity, but overall, the language and grammar are strong.
Vocabulary and word expression: 5/6
The vocabulary and word expression in the essay are generally strong. The writer uses a variety of vocabulary to convey their ideas effectively. There are instances where more precise and specific language could have been used to enhance the clarity and precision of the arguments presented. Some phrases and expressions could have been refined for greater impact.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid level of coherence and connectivity, with well-structured paragraphs and clear reasoning. The word structure, language, grammar, and vocabulary are generally strong, with only minor areas for improvement. Considering these factors, the essay receives a score of 5.5 out of 6.
Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates a high level of coherence and connectivity. The ideas are well-organized and logically presented. The essay follows a clear structure, with an introduction that states the argument, body paragraphs that analyze the flaws in the reasoning, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points. Transitions between paragraphs are smooth, guiding the reader through the essay effectively.
Word structure: 5/6
The word structure is generally strong throughout the essay. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures to convey their ideas. There are no major issues with word choice, and the essay demonstrates a good command of vocabulary and language usage. However, there are a few instances where sentence structure could have been improved for clarity and precision.
Paragraph structure and formation: 5.5/6
The essay follows a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph addressing a specific flaw in the argument. The paragraphs are well-developed and provide adequate explanation and evidence to support the points being made. The writer effectively uses topic sentences to introduce the main idea of each paragraph and provides relevant examples and explanations to support their analysis.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The essay exhibits a strong command of language and grammar. The sentences are generally well-constructed, and there are no major grammatical errors. The writer effectively uses appropriate verb tenses and maintains consistency in language usage. There are a few minor instances where sentence structure could be improved for greater clarity, but overall, the language and grammar are strong.
Vocabulary and word expression: 5/6
The vocabulary and word expression in the essay are generally strong. The writer uses a variety of vocabulary to convey their ideas effectively. There are instances where more precise and specific language could have been used to enhance the clarity and precision of the arguments presented. Some phrases and expressions could have been refined for greater impact.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid level of coherence and connectivity, with well-structured paragraphs and clear reasoning. The word structure, language, grammar, and vocabulary are generally strong, with only minor areas for improvement. Considering these factors, the essay receives a score of 5.5 out of 6.
cygnus87
Moderator:
